Talk:The Ancient Trilogy

GA review

Passed. Z. Patterson (talk) 22:37, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:The Ancient Trilogy/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Piotrus (talk · contribs) 12:54, 21 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Z. Patterson (talk · contribs) 01:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I will be reviewing the article. Z. Patterson (talk) 01:54, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Piotrus: The article has no copyright violations.
The article appears to be well-written, stable, neutral, verifiable, and broad in coverage, despite its length. I have some points to address.
  • The article should have illustrations. Would you be able to add one or two to the article?
  • The article has many quotes.
    • For shorter quotes, I think it would be helpful to include the original phrases in Polish as footnotes.
    • I think some of the longer quotes could be paraphrased.
  • There is no set date format or English language variant, but I see "criticized" in the prose.
If you make these changes, or otherwise address these points, I will pass the article as a good article. I will give you seven days to address these.
Z. Patterson (talk) 02:14, 13 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Z. Patterson Thx.
Re images: I've added a photo of the author. I am not sure if we can add a photo of covers for the edition of 1973 that arguably fails Commons:Threshold_of_originality#Poland ([1], [2], since Commons is not very clear on whether TOO exception can be used for Polish media or not). I'll ping User:Masur for his thoughts.
I did some c/e to the quotations, rewriting some, removing the unnecessary quotations for tiny fragments (common words/expressions) which arguably don't need to be quoted at all. I am not sure what to move to the footnotes - I think the article is short enough it doesn't needed them.
I am unsure how to fix the "criticized" issue particularly as I don't see any DMY/MDY dates?
Please note I am on holidays, so my replies may take longer than usual. Tnx for the review! Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 09:20, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Piotrus: You are welcome. I made the remaining changes myself. I chose Oxford spelling and DMY dates because of using "Z" in words such as "criticize", and dates were in year, month, day format before I made the changes. I will pass this as a good article. Z. Patterson (talk) 22:36, 14 July 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:The_Ancient_Trilogy