This article is rated Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Albums This article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlbumsWikipedia:WikiProject AlbumsTemplate:WikiProject AlbumsAlbum Pop music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Pop music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of articles related to pop music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Pop musicWikipedia:WikiProject Pop musicTemplate:WikiProject Pop musicPop music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. Rock music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject Rock music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Rock music on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Rock musicWikipedia:WikiProject Rock musicTemplate:WikiProject Rock musicRock music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale. R&B and Soul Music Low‑importance This article is within the scope of WikiProject R&B and Soul Music, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of R&B and Soul Music articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.R&B and Soul MusicWikipedia:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicTemplate:WikiProject R&B and Soul MusicR&B and Soul Music Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Swaay. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

• Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20161230202617/http://hitlisten.nu/top2016.asp to http://hitlisten.nu/top2016.asp
• Corrected formatting/usage for https://itunes.apple.com/us/album/swaay-ep/id1050241373

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

• If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
• If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 17:32, 29 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Unsuccessful. Lazman321 (talk) 02:50, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

---

This review is transcluded from Talk:Swaay/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Artmanha (talk · contribs) 06:38, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: Lazman321 (talk · contribs) 00:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Good Article review progress box Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV () 3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant () Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

This will be my first review for the drive. Lazman321 (talk) 00:51, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1 - Well written

1a - Clear and concise prose

Fail - See verdict. Lazman321 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

1b - Adherence to the Manual of Style

2 - Verifiable with no original research

2a - Identifiable list of references

List of references comply with relevant guidelines. Pass. Lazman321 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2b - Reliable sources

2c - No original research

Conducting spotchecks here. Lazman321 (talk) 01:02, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Fail - See verdict. Lazman321 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2d - No copyright violations

Fail - See verdict. Lazman321 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

3 - Broad in its coverage

3a - Main aspects

3b - Focused

4 - Neutral

5 - Stable

No ongoing edit war or content dispute. Pass Lazman321 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

6 - Illustrated by media

6a - Copyright tags

The one piece of media, the cover art, has a valid fair-use rationale. Pass Lazman321 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

6b - Relevant media

The one piece of media, the cover art, is patently relevant to the subject. Pass Lazman321 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

7 - Verdict

I'm so sorry, but even though this has been in the backlog for so long, I'm going to have to quick-fail this review. Spot-checks identified issues regarding source-text integrity and plagiarism that are too extensive to address during a review. I also noticed writing issues throughout the article that are too extensive, often in the form of awkward and vague wording. Lazman321 (talk) 02:48, 7 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.