This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Amphibians and Reptiles Low‑importance Southern torrent frog is part of WikiProject Amphibians and Reptiles, an effort to make Wikipedia a standardized, informative, comprehensive and easy-to-use resource for amphibians and reptiles. If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit this article, or visit the project page for more information.Amphibians and ReptilesWikipedia:WikiProject Amphibians and ReptilesTemplate:WikiProject Amphibians and Reptilesamphibian and reptile Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Southern torrent frog/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Olmagon (talk · contribs) 00:32, 18 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: ZKevinTheCat (talk · contribs) 17:29, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Starting the GA review. Good luck. — ZKevinTheCat

Overall, this article is pretty good. There is not too much wrong with it, and I don't think there is anything that would disqualify from being a GA. For these reasons, I am passing the article.

1. Prose
Overall very well written. Sentences flow into each other nicely and the overall structure is well defined and easy to follow.

2. Sources
Spot check: [5] - good, [8] - good, [9] - good
Sources are cited in the text and everything that needs a source has one.

3. Coverage
Everything that there is to know about this frog is in the article. After reading it I wasn't left wanting any more.

4. Neutrality
There was one sentence near the end that was a little iffy in this regard, but I changed it to be more general. Other than that, this looks good.

5. Stability
Not really a contentious subject, all clear.

6. Illustration
There are plenty of images in this article, and none of them are copyrighted to my knowledge. ZKevinTheCat (talk) 21:03, 30 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]