Talk:Johnson Wax Headquarters
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified one external link on Johnson Wax Headquarters. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20090403223557/http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1521&ResourceType=Building to http://tps.cr.nps.gov/nhl/detail.cfm?ResourceId=1521&ResourceType=Building
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 11:09, 29 November 2017 (UTC)
Did you know nomination
- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by SL93 talk 21:08, 22 January 2025 (UTC)
- ... that the columns in the Johnson Wax Headquarters Administration Building have been compared to lily pads, golf tees, and ice cream cones? Source: SC Johnson HQ: Exterior and Interior". PBS.; Evjue, William J. (March 17, 1962). "Businessmen Who Wanted Top Work Turned to Wright". The Capital Times. pp. 1, 8; "Lloyd Wright Tests Column". Kenosha News. Associated Press. June 5, 1937. p. 2.
- ALT1: ... that the interior of the Johnson Wax Headquarters Administration Building was once compared to "a woman swimming naked in a stream"? Source: "New Frank Lloyd Wright Office Building Shows Shape of Things to Come". Life. Time Inc. May 8, 1939. p. 15.
- ALT2: ... that the Johnson Wax Headquarters Research Tower had no fire sprinklers because its architect disliked their appearance? Source: Lipman, Jonathan (1986). Frank Lloyd Wright and the Johnson Wax Buildings. Mineola, NY: Courier Corporation. p. 164.
- ALT3: ... that combustible items were banned from the Johnson Wax Headquarters Research Tower, which had no fire sprinklers because its architect disliked their appearance? Source: Lipman, Jonathan (1986). Frank Lloyd Wright and the Johnson Wax Buildings. Mineola, NY: Courier Corporation. p. 164.
- ALT4: ... that Frank Lloyd Wright designed a four-legged chair for the Johnson Wax Headquarters after people kept falling off a three-legged chair he designed? Source: Tenuta, Marci Laehr (October 22, 2001). "Organic and in demand". The Journal Times. p. 53.
- Reviewed: Template:Did you know nominations/List of Mingxing films
- Comment: I can suggest more hooks later if desired.
Epicgenius (talk) 01:00, 2 January 2025 (UTC).
| General: Article is new enough and long enough |
|---|
| Policy: Article is sourced, neutral, and free of copyright problems |
|---|
|
| Hook: Hook has been verified by provided inline citation |
|---|
|
| Image: Image is freely licensed, used in the article, and clear at 100px. |
|---|
|
| QPQ: Done. |
Overall:
Vacant0 (talk • contribs) 22:12, 2 January 2025 (UTC)
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Johnson Wax Headquarters/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: Epicgenius (talk · contribs) 18:15, 31 December 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Hog Farm (talk · contribs) 21:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
I'll try to get to this over the next week. Hog Farm Talk 21:33, 21 June 2025 (UTC)
- Apologies for the delay - I expect to be able to start tomorrow. Hog Farm Talk 02:58, 27 June 2025 (UTC)
Hey there! I started a few source checks for this one but I didn't finish. In case it's helpful, I can share what I had so far. Pencilsforall (talk) 00:56, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
Thank you for the thought but I really prefer to do these myself as I conduct the review. Hog Farm Talk 03:02, 24 June 2025 (UTC)
| ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
- "The initial drawings lacked windows, though a revised blueprint from 1936 did include windows" - I don't think this is quite right. The source reads {{xt|The 1935 Matson plans seem to show a building with few or no windows" which leaves this open a bit and very much allows for a building that doesn't entirely lack windows
- There's a few references to "Fortaleza Hall and The Commons" as a single thing, but it's never elaborated what "The Commons" is
I did sporadic spot-checking throughought the entire article and just had the one issue with the windows above. Source reliability looks OK; and image licensing is good enough for GA. This article is in excellent shape. Hog Farm Talk 00:18, 28 June 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks for the review @Hog Farm.
- I have reworded that sentence to address your first point.
- I have clarified what the Commons is, and added a reference.
- – Epicgenius (talk) 00:29, 28 June 2025 (UTC)