This review is transcluded from Talk:Ich hab in Gottes Herz und Sinn, BWV 92/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Gerda Arendt (talk · contribs) 23:32, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: OmegaAOL (talk · contribs) 19:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)
It is reasonably well written. a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists): It is factually accurate and verifiable, as shown by a source spot-check. a (references): b (citations to reliable sources): c (OR): d (copyvio and plagiarism): It is broad in its coverage. a (major aspects): b (focused): It follows the neutral point of view policy. Fair representation without bias: It is stable. No edit wars, etc.: It is illustrated by images, where possible and appropriate. a (images are tagged and non-free images have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
Overall: Pass/Fail:
· · ·

Hello! I'll be your reviewer for today. I have already fixed the (very minor) problems in this article (listed below) and passed it. Congratulations on your Good Article!

• Spot check of citations done. Everything is cited, citations are valid and contain the source material, and are reliable sources.
• Small grammar and prose issues, such as the comma instead of a semicolon in The cantata is based on "Ich hab in Gottes Herz und Sinn", a hymn in twelve stanzas by Paul Gerhardt published in 1647,[4][7] Gerhard is regarded as one of the most important Protestant hymnwriters, and prose inconsistency in the First Epistle to the Corinthians, "race for victory" (1 Corinthians 9:24–10:5), and from the Gospel of Matthew, the parable of the Workers in the Vineyard (Matthew 20:1–16). Both, along with some others, have been copyedited.
• Article lead accurately describes breadth of article without including citations, which is good, and layout, words, fiction, and lists points get quick passes as well.
• Point 3 also gets a pass. The article covers the history, creation, and structure of the cantata.
• It follows WP:NPOV and does not make any statements in wikivoice. The closest it could get to being biased is the statement Gerhard is regarded as one of the most important Protestant hymnwriters, but it cites a source and does not use restricted words like "best", or attempt to speak for Wikipedia/in wikivoice.
• Article is pretty stable and it looks like the nominator alone has worked on most of it.
• It is illustrated by the only relevant image; a portrait of Gerhardt. This is a pass.
• It does lean a bit heavily on musical terms, but that is expected of such an article and cannot really be feasibly reduced without making it more confusing and irrelevant to its intended audience.
• Overall, great work, nominator! I see you already have a lot of G.A's under your belt. Let this be the next one in a long line of badges of great article-writing skills. Thank you for the opportunity to review this - I learned something new. - OmegaAOL (talk) 19:52, 30 October 2025 (UTC)[reply]