Talk:I Didn't Mean to Haunt You

Why was the story removed from Wikipedia article

^ PLUNGERwasHere (talk) 16:31, 2 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

GA review

Pass LastJabberwocky (talk) 19:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:I Didn't Mean to Haunt You/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Nominator: Locust member (talk · contribs) 19:42, 22 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Reviewer: LastJabberwocky (talk · contribs) 13:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I'm picking up your nomination! Most of the things seem to be great. I gave a few suggestions below and edited some of the changed myself. We can discuss my edits here. LastJabberwocky (talk) 13:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for picking this up! Locust member (talk) 18:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
That's pretty much it, promoting! LastJabberwocky (talk) 19:52, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Good Article review progress box
Criteria: 1a. prose () 1b. MoS () 2a. ref layout () 2b. cites WP:RS () 2c. no WP:OR () 2d. no WP:CV ()
3a. broadness () 3b. focus () 4. neutral () 5. stable () 6a. free or tagged images () 6b. pics relevant ()
Note: this represents where the article stands relative to the Good Article criteria. Criteria marked are unassessed

General things

You mention the minimalist approach of the record in the production giving "Picking Up Hands" as an example. The composition again mentions the minimalist approach but doesn't give any new details. Should we keep this sentence, are there anything else said about this song? Quadeca's singing is met with a guitar on the following "Picking Up Hands". LastJabberwocky (talk) 13:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done I moved the sentence from the Production section to the Composition section to avoid repetition Locust member (talk) 18:54, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

In a positive review for Spill Magazine, Zivkovic believed that "it all meshes together" in the album's and risks and concept, calling the latter "a tricky proposition in itself". I think this one can be clarified. LastJabberwocky (talk) 13:00, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

 Done Locust member (talk) 18:55, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

copyvios shows 43.5%, which seems to be too high. Mostly picks up quotes in the sections before reception. I would try rephrasing: "Jesse, this needs to come out in 2022", "Oh shit, you can do that?", and "want to do too much". Maybe the first half of this can be rephrased: "Quadeca announced that he was sitting on the greatest ever posthumous album".

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Fantano

@ULPS It is pretty established that Fantano reviews are not on the same tier of notability as reviews in media publications that go through editorial processes, which is why you won't see Fantano reviews on Wikipedia pages for the vast majority of albums he's reviewed, even albums that he has given rave reviews. It's also pretty clear that this article over-relies as Fantano as a source; I'm as much of a fan of his videos as anyone else, but using his videos as sources (let alone three of his videos in one article) feels like WP:FANCRUFT and has especially WP:UNDUE weight on this article. BanjoZebra (talk) 16:48, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I definitely agree with the overciting of him in this article (I wasn’t the one who added that) but I think on its own simply using him for a review isn’t crazy. Feel free to re-revert me, I don’t have a super strong opinion on this, but I’d raise your concerns with the primary author @Locust member. ULPS (talk • contribs) 16:56, 12 August 2025 (UTC)[reply]
allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:I_Didn%27t_Mean_to_Haunt_You