Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camellia railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}).

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:52, 13 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Camellia railway station. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 16:20, 29 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Move discussion in progress

There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:Dundas railway station, Sydney which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 10:49, 25 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 28 February 2025

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. (non-admin closure) TarnishedPathtalk 09:42, 22 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Camellia railway station → Rosehill Gardens light rail station – As per discussion here, which resulted in the other articles being moved but did not reach consensus on this one. The new station is less than 90m from the old one. The former location of Schofields railway station was 800m north of the current site and that article covers both locations. The new station should be considered the successor to the old one. DilatoryRevolution (talk) 03:32, 28 February 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2025 (UTC) — Relisting. Feeglgeef (talk) 19:16, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I disagree, Camellia and Rosehill Gardens should have separate pages. The example of Schofields isn't the same in my opinion since the new station still serves the same line, service and mode of transport and still has the same name. With Camellia, unlike the other converted stations, Rosehill Gardens isn't located on the former station site (though it is pretty close), and Camellia and Rosehill Gardens should reference each other instead. I haven't had much time recently but I've started adding more info to this page since Camellia was important in itself back in the day as well. Hlmrjk (talk) 14:07, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Note: WikiProject Trains and WikiProject Australian Transport have been notified of this discussion. Sophisticatedevening (talk) 14:59, 7 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Relisting comment: More participation Feeglgeef (talk) 19:16, 14 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Camellia_railway_station
No tags for this post.