Talk:2017–18 College Football Playoff
| This article is rated GA-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||
| |||||||||||||||||||||
GA review
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
- This review is transcluded from Talk:2017–18 College Football Playoff/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: PCN02WPS (talk · contribs) 02:25, 18 November 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: CosXZ (talk · contribs) 18:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
| GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) |
|---|
|
|
Overall: |
Copyvio check
Earwig shows a 3.8% which is good. Cos (X + Z) 18:58, 24 April 2025 (UTC)
Prose
- The three-game playoff recorded an increase of 21% over the previous edition, an increase of what?
- Ha, oops. Fixed with "...a viewership increase of 21%..." PCN02WPS (talk | contribs) 03:29, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
Sources
Sources are reliable, formatted great and no OR; I did a check of all sources while I reviewed prose. Passing article. Cos (X + Z) 16:23, 25 April 2025 (UTC)
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.