The roll-call votes on the death of Louis XVI were held in the Salle du Manège (image from 1792)

A series of votes were held at the end of the trial of Louis XVI to determine his guilt and the appropriate punishment. After voting on two initial questions on Tuesday 15 January 1793, the députés considered sentencing over 37 uninterrupted hours of debate on Wednesday 16 and Thursday 17 January. Pierre Victurnien Vergniaud was president during these sessions.[1][2]

Questions

The debate on Monday 14 January was occupied with determining the wording of the resolutions to be voted on.[1][3]: 226 

On Tuesday 15 January 1793, at the National Convention, a roll call vote took place on the first two questions:[1][3]: 226 [4]: 80–87 

  • 1 "Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State, yes or no?"
  • 2 "Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted to the ratification of the people, yes or no?"[5]

The members from each département were called in turn, beginning with the letter G, with each announcing their votes from the podium.

Next, from 10:30 am on Wednesday 16 January until the evening of Thursday 17 January, without interruption, a roll-call vote was conducted on the third question, starting with the département of Haute-Garonne:[3]: 228 [4]: 92–110 

  • 3 "What punishment should be imposed be imposed on Louis?"

It was then that Jean-Baptiste Mailhe, the first to speak, declared:

"As a natural consequence of the opinion that I have already expressed on the first question, I vote for the death of Louis. I will make only one observation. If death has the majority, I think that it would be worthwhile for the National Convention to examine whether it would not be politic and useful to hasten, or to delay, the moment of execution. This proposition is independent of my vote. I return to the first question and I vote for death."[3]: 228 

Some members of the Convention complained that there had been irregularity in the voting in the third question. Following a debate, the Convention agreed that there would be a second roll-call vote in the third question, where each member would be asked to confirm their vote. This meant that there were a total of five votes on four substantive questions.[3]: 232–3 [6]

Mailhe's suggestion raised the question of whether, for any reason, the death sentence ought to be stayed. At the session on Saturday 19 January, despite fierce opposition from Jean-Paul Marat, on the motion of fr:René-Pierre Choudieu, the Convention decreed that it would immediately discuss the question of a reprieve, and that the question would be put as follows:[7]

  • 4 "Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?" and that the answer was to be "yes" or "no".

The roll call vote was held in alphabetical order by département, starting with Gers.[4]: 118–9 

Votes

The result of the votes on the four questions were as follows:[8]

Summary by département

Ain – Aisne – Allier – Basses-Alpes – Hautes-Alpes – Ardèche – Ardennes – Ariège – Aube – Aude – Aveyron – Bouches-du-Rhône – Calvados – Cantal – Charente – Charente-Inférieure – Cher – Corrèze – Corse – Côte-d'Or – Côtes-du-Nord – Creuse – Dordogne – Doubs – Drôme – Eure – Eure-et-Loir – Finistère – Gard – Haute-Garonne – Gers – Gironde – Hérault – Ille-et-Vilaine – Indre – Indre-et-Loire – Isère – Jura – Landes – Loir-et-Cher – Loire – Haute-Loire – Loire-Inférieure – Loiret – Lot – Lot-et-Garonne –Lozère - Maine-et-Loire – Manche – Marne – Haute-Marne – Mayenne – Meurthe – Meuse – Morbihan – Moselle – Nièvre – Nord – Oise – Orne – Paris – Pas-de-Calais – Puy-de-Dôme – Basses-Pyrénées – Hautes-Pyrénées – Pyrénées-Orientales – Bas-Rhin – Haut-Rhin – Rhône-et-Loire – Haute-Saône – Saône-et-Loire – Sarthe – Seine-Inférieure – Seine-et-Marne – Seine-et-Oise – Deux-Sèvres – Somme – Tarn – Var – Vendée – Vienne – Haute-Vienne – Vosges – Yonne

Députés are listed by département in the order in which they were elected.

Ain

6 députés and 2 substitutes[9]: 44 [10]

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Étienne Deydier Yes No Death No
fr:Antoine-François Gauthier des Orcières Yes No Death No
fr:Jean-Baptiste Royer Yes Yes Confinement for the duration of the war and banishment after peace is declared Yes
Grégoire Jagot en mission en mission en mission en mission
fr:Jean Luc Anthelme Mollet Yes Yes Detention, then banishment when the security situation permits Yes
fr:Jean-Marie François Merlino Yes Yes Death No

Aisne

12 députés and 4 substitutes[9]: 45 [10]

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Nicolas-Marie Quinette Yes No Death No
fr:Jean Antoine Debry Yes No, justified Death No
fr:Louis Étienne Beffroy Yes Yes Death No
Louis Antoine Léon de Saint-Just Yes No Death No
fr:Jean-François Belin Yes Yes Detention until peace is declared, and death if foreign powers seek to restore him Yes
fr:Michel Edme Petit Yes Yes Death No
Nicolas de Condorcet Yes No The severest criminal penalty short of death. Abstained
fr:Jean-Jacques Fiquet Yes Yes Confinement during the war and deportation after peace is declared Yes
fr:Marie Jean François Philibert Le Carlier d'Ardon Yes No Death No
fr:Pierre Loysel Yes Yes Death with a reprieve until the people accept the new constitution Yes
fr:André Dupin de Beaumont Yes No The severest penalty short of death No
fr:Augustin Bouchereau Yes No Death with a reprieve to be determined by the Convention Yes

Allier

7 députés and 4 substitutes[9]: 46 [10]

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Gilbert Chevalier Yes Yes Abstained Abstained
fr:Pourçain Martel Yes No Death No
fr:Claude-Lazare Petitjean Yes Abstained Death No
fr:Pierre Jacques Forestier Yes No Death No
fr:Joseph Beauchamp en mission en mission en mission en mission
fr: Pierre François Félix Joseph Giraud Yes No Death, with a reprieve until the Convention has taken measures to ensure public security unwell, did not vote
fr:Étienne Vidalin Yes No Death en mission

Basses-Alpes

6 députés and 2 substitutes[9]: 46 [10]

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Jacques Verdollin Yes Yes Imprisonment for the duration of the war and banishment after peace is declared Yes
fr:Claude Louis Réguis Yes Yes Detention throughout the war and exile following peace, on pain of death Yes
fr:Pierre Jacques Dherbez-Latour Yes No Death No
fr:Marius Félix Maïsse Yes Yes Death Unwell, did not vote
Louis François Peyre Yes Yes Death, with the Mailhe amendment No
fr:Marc-Antoine Savornin Yes No Death, with the Mailhe amendment No

Hautes-Alpes

5 députés and 4 substitutes[9]: 46 

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Pierre Barrety Yes Yes Detention during the war and exile after peace is declared Yes
fr:Hyacinthe-Marcelin Borel du Bez Yes Yes Detention during the war and exile after peace is declared Yex
fr:Jean-François Izoard Yes Abstained, but declared that if the king was condemned to death he would vote "yes" Detention for the time being, taking such measures as new circumstances might require. Yes
Jean-Joseph Serres Yes Yes Detention during the war and exile after peace is declared Yes
Ignace Caseneuve As a legislator, yes, but not as a judge Yes Detention during the war and exile after peace is declared Yes

Ardèche

7 députés and 3 substitutes.[9]: 47 

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
François-Antoine de Boissy d'Anglas Yes Yes Imprisonment in a secure place until peace is declared and the recognition of the French Republic allows the representatives of the nation to order his banishment Yes
Hector de Soubeyran de Saint-Prix Yes Yes Death with reprieve until peace is achieved and all the Bourbons expelled Yes
François-Joseph Gamon Yes Yes, justified Death with reprieve until enemy countries reappear on the territory of the Republic Yes
fr:François-Jérôme Riffard Saint-Martin Yes Yes, justified Confinement until the end of the war, and after the peace, perpetual banishment Yes
fr:François-Clément Privat de Garilhe Yes Yes Confinement until peace and the recognition of our new government, then exile outside French territory. Yes
fr:Claude Gleizal Yes No Death with reprieve until the Convention makes a determination about the fate of the condemned's family Yes
fr: Simon Joseph Coren-Fustier Yes, justified Yes Confinement until the Republican government of France is recognised, then perpetual banishment, on pain of death. Yes

Ardennes

8 députés and 4 substitutes.[9]: 47 

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
Edmond Louis Alexis Dubois-Crancé Yes No Death No
fr:Claude Joseph Ferry Yes No Death No
fr:Jean-Baptiste Augustin Prosper Mennesson Yes Yes Death with a reprieve until the removal of the Duke of Orléans and his family from the Cnventiom. Yes
fr: Alexis Joseph Vermon Yes Yes Detention until peace, but death in the event of foreign invasion of the territory of the Republic Yes
Michel Robert Yes No Death Yes
Pierre-Charles-Louis Baudin Yes Yes justified Confinement throughout the war and deportation after peace Yes
fr: Claude Thierriet Yes Yes Perpetual detention Yes
fr: Jacques Blondel Yes Yes Detention, on the express condition that he be punished with death if the enemies of the state set foot on the territory of the Republic. Yes

Ariège

6 députés and 2 substitutes.[9]: 48 

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
Marc-Guillaume-Alexis Vadier Yes No Death No
Jean-Baptiste Clauzel Yes No Death No
fr:Pierre Campmartin Yes No Death No
fr:Jean Espert Yes No Death No
Joseph Lakanal Yes No Death No
fr:Raymond Gaston Yes No Death No

Aube

9 députés and 3 substitutes.[9]: 49 

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
Edme-Bonaventure Courtois Yes No Death No
fr:Louis Antoine Joseph Robin Yes No Death No
fr:Pierre Nicolas Perrin Yes Yes Detention until peace and banishment at that time Yes
fr: Claude Duval de Fraville Yes No Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr:Jean Thomas Bonnemain Yes Yes Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr: Joseph Nicolas Pierret Yes Yes Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr: Jean-Claude Douge Yes Yes Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes
Antoine Marie Charles Garnier Yes No Death No
Jean-Paul Rabaut de Saint-Étienne Yes Yes Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes

Aude

8 députés and 3 substitutes.[9]: 49 

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Michel Azéma Yes No Death No
fr:Pierre François Bonnet Yes No Death No
fr:Dominique-Vincent Ramel-Nogaret Yes Yes justified Death No
fr:Jean-Laurent-Germain Tournier Yes Yes Confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr:Jean-Baptiste Marragon Yes Yes Death No
fr:François Antoine Morin Yes Yes Detention throughout the war and banishment after peace, unless exceptional measures are necessary, including pain of death if an invasion of French territory takes place. Yes
fr:Jacques Périès Yes Yes Confinement of Louis and his family thoroughly the war and banishment for all of them after peace Yes
fr:Antoine Marie Girard Yes Yes Death Yes

Aveyron

9 députés and 3 substitutes.[9]: 50 

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Jean-Baptiste Bô Yes No Death No
fr:Charles Saint-Martin-Valogne Yes Yes Confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr:Louis Lobinhès I declare: yes as a legislator, but have no wish to act as a judge Yes Detention throughout the war and exile after peace Yes
fr:Louis Bernard de Saint-Affrique Yes No Imprisonment throughout the war and banishment thereafter, when the Assembly thinks it appropriate Yes
fr:Simon Camboulas Yes No Death No
fr:Jean-Louis Second Yes No Death No
fr:Joseph-Henri Lacombe Yes No Death with the Mailhe amendment No
fr:Louis Louchet Yes No Death No
fr:Xavier Godefroy d'Yzarn de Freissinet de Valady Abstained Yes Imprisonment of Louis, his wife and children in the château de Saumur, where they should be guarded as hostages until Francis of Austria recognises the sovereignty of the French Republic and the independence of the Belgians. Yes

Bouches-du-Rhône

12 députés and 7 substitutes.[9]: 51 

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
Jean Duprat Yes Yes Death No
François Rebecqui Yes Yes Death No
Charles Jean Marie Barbaroux Yes Yes Death Yes
fr:François Omer Granet Yes No Death No
fr:Pierre-Toussaint Durand de Maillane Yes justified Yes justified Detention until peace, then banishment on pain of death Sick
Thomas-Augustin de Gasparin Yes No Death No
Moyse Bayle Yes No Death No
fr:Pierre Marie Baille Yes No Death No
Stanislas Joseph François Xavier Rovère Yes No Death No
fr:Claude Romain Lauze de Perret Yes Yes Confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace in pain of death Yes
fr:Denis-Marie Pellissier Yes No Death No
fr:Bernard Laurens Yes No Death No

Calvados

Liste comparative des cinq appels nominaux by J-F. Froullé et T. Levigneur (contemporary oublcation listing the results of the roll-call votes)
Liste comparative des cinq appels nominaux, page 25

13 députés and 5 substitutes

  1. Claude Fauchet, 1° yes, as citizen and legislator. As a judge I have no standing, and I make no pronouncement, 2° yes justified, 3° Confinement during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  2. fr:Louis Dubois du Bais, 1° yes justified, 2° yes 3° death with reprieve until the foreign powers set foot on our territory, or until others join them in making war on us, 4° yes.
  3. fr:Jean-Baptiste Lomont, 1° abstained and justified his position, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
  4. Pierre Henry-Larivière, 1° abstained and justified his position, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and exile after peace, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Pierre-Louis Bonnet de Mautry, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
  6. fr:Louis-Alexandre-Jacques Vardon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until foreign nations recognise the independence of the Republic and the sovereignty of the French people, and exile after peace, 4° yes.
  7. Doulcet de Pontécoulant, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° provisional detention and expulsion after peace, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Jacques Taveau, 1° yes justified, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until our enemies attempt to invade our territory or until the adoption of the constitution, 4° yes.
  9. fr:Thomas Jouenne-Longchamp, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until such time as the Convention decides it should take place, 4° no.
  10. fr:Louis-Philippe Dumont, 1° yes justified, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war and perpetual banishment once the republican government is solidly established, 4° yes.
  11. fr:Gabriel de Cussy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  12. fr:Alexandre Legot, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  13. fr:Jean-François Philippe-Delleville, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.

Cantal

8 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. Anne-Alexandre-Marie Thibault, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° confinement during the war and, after peace, expulsion of Louis, his family and all the Bourbons, 4° yes.
  2. Édouard Jean Baptiste Milhaud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr: Jacques Méjansac, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace, 4° sick.
  4. Jean-Baptiste Lacoste, 1° yes, 2° not justified p, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. Jean-Baptiste Carrier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Joseph Mailhes, 1° absent, 2° absent, 3° absent, 4° absent.(*)
  7. fr:Antoine Dominique Chabanon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° Detention until peace, then perpetual banishment, 4° yes.
  8. fr: Guillaume Peuvergne, 1° oui, 2° oui, 3° confinement throughout the war and banishment after peace, 4° oui.

(*-In late 1792 Joseph Mailhes declared himself unable to accept the position of député owing to illness, and resigned. On 13 December 1792 the General Council of the Cantal department appointed fr:Jean-Pierre Malhes to replace him. Malhes had been elected as the first substitute member in the elections to the Convention in September 1792. Malhes arrived in Paris on 17 January 17, 1793 and was promptly admitted to the Convention as Mailhes' replacement. However, as neither Mailhes nor Malhes was able to participate in the roll call votes, it is Mailhes' name that appears in the register for those votes, followed by the words "absent due to illness" and "absent without cause").[11][12]

Charente

9 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. fr:Antoine Dubois de Bellegarde, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr:Jean Guimberteau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Jean-François Simon Chazaud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° yes, 4° no.
  4. fr:Augustin Chedaneau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Jean-Pierre Ribéreau, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr:Jean-Baptiste Devars, 1° oui, 2° oui, 3° detention followed by banishment, 4° yes.
  7. Jean Brun, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  8. fr: Jacques Crevelier 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr:Pierre-Jacques Maulde de Loisellerie, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° perpetual detention, unless exceptional measures are required when the constitution is presented for popular approval or after the end of the war, 4° yes.

Charente-Inférieure

11 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. André Antoine Bernard, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. Jean-Jacques Bréard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. Joseph Eschassériaux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. Joseph Niou, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° yes, 4° no.
  5. fr:Pierre-Charles Ruamps, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Jacques Garnier , 1° yes justified, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr: Gustave Dechézeaux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until circumstances allow this to be replaced by banishment, 4° no.
  8. fr:Paul Augustin Lozeau, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr: Marc Antoine Alexis Giraud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  10. fr: Pierre Étienne Vinet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  11. fr: Jacques Sébastien Dautriche, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace, after which the Convention or the legislature will take the measures it judges appropriate, 4° yes.

Cher

6 députés and 2 substitutes

  1. fr:Pierre Allasœur, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment until peace, then banishment, 4° yes.
  2. fr:Jacques Foucher, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° en mission.
  3. fr:François Baucheton, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  4. fr:Charles-Benoît Fauvre-Labrunerie, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Élie-François Dugenne, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  6. Jacques Pelletier, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° yes.

Corrèze

7 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. Jacques Brival, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr:Borie, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr: Bigorie du Chambon, 1° yes justified, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° abstained
  4. fr:Bernard-François Lidon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
  5. fr:Antoine-Joseph Lanot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr:Jean-Augustin Pénières, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr: Pierre Raymond Lafon de Beaulieu, 1° abstained and justified his decision, 2° abstained, 3° recused himself, 4° abstained.

Corse

6 députés and 2 substitutes

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
Christophe Saliceti Yes as a citizen, and not as a judge No Death No
fr:Ange Chiappe Yes justified Yes Detention during the war and deportation afterwards Sick
fr:Luc-Julien-Joseph Casabianca Yes No Detention, apart from any measures the Convention might take depending on circumstances Yes
fr:Antoine Andrei Yes Yes Confinement for as long as necessary for the salvation of the country Yes
fr:Jean-Baptiste Bozi Yes Yes Confinement until peace, then banishment absent
fr:Jean André Moltedo Yes No Detention during the war sick

Côte-d'Or

10 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. Claude Basire, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. Louis-Bernard Guyton-Morveau, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. Claude-Antoine Prieur-Duvernois, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Charles-François Oudot (Charles-François), 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Florent-Guiot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Charles Lambert de Belan, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° imprisonment throughout the war and deportation after peace, so long as the people do not grant future legislatures the power to determine his fate otherwise, 4° sick.
  7. fr:Nicolas-Joseph Marey, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention throughout the war and expulsion one year after the tyrants have laid down their weapons and recognised the Republic, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Narcisse Trullard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr:Juste Rameau de La Cérée, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° immediate and perpetual banishment without prejudice to any measures to be taken against family, 4° yes.
  10. fr:Théophile Berlier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Côtes-du-Nord

8 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Gabriel Hyacinthe Couppé, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° Confinement during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  2. fr:Julien-François Palasne de Champeaux, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, as a hostage, and expulsion after peace, on pain of death, 4° yes.
  3. fr: René Claude Gaultier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° perpetual detention, 4° yes.
  4. fr:Pierre Guyomar, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional detention during the wat and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Honoré-Marie Fleury, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  6. fr:Claude-Joseph Girault, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  7. fr: René-Charles Loncle des Aleux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  8. fr: Guillaume Julien Pierre Goudelin, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until the end of dangers to the homeland will allow him and his family to be banished, or until a new invasion of our land obliges the Convention to take his head on the scaffold, according to the demand of the people, 4° yes.

Creuse

7 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Marc-Antoine Huguet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
  2. fr:Jean Debourges, 1° yes/recused himself (sources vary), 2° yes, 3° abstained, 4° abstained.
  3. fr:Jean-Baptiste Coutisson-Dumas, 1° yes, as a statesman and not as a judge, 2° yes, 3° confinement until the Constitution is adopted, and a law is passed specifically concerning the fate of the tyrant, 4° yes.
  4. fr:Jean-François Guyès, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Louis Jorrand, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, then banishment one year after peace, 4° no.
  6. fr:Jean-François Barailon, 1° recused himself and justified his position, 2° sick, 3° detention, until some other measure may be required for public safety, 4° yes.
  7. fr:Léonard-Michel Texier-Mortegoute, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, 4° no.

Dordogne

10 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:François Lamarque, 1° not included in the roll call, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Jacques Pinet, 1° not included in the roll call, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. Élie Lacoste, 1° not included in the roll call, 2° no, 3° death, 4° non.
  4. fr:Pierre Roux-Fazillac, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Jean Guillaume Taillefer, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr:Jean-Pascal Charles de Peyssard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr: Étienne Cambort-Borie, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° sick.
  8. fr:Jean Allafort, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr: François Meynard, 1° made a declaration, but did not answer the question, 2° yes, 3° detention throughout the war, until after peace determining whether exceptional measures ought to be taken for the tranquility and safety of the Republic, 4° yes.
  10. fr: Gabriel Bouquier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Doubs

6 députés and 2 substitutes

  1. fr:Jean-Baptiste Quirot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war and banishment after peace, 4° no.
  2. fr: Jean-Baptiste Michaud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Philippe Charles François Seguin, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and banishment after the re-establishment of peace, 4° yes.
  4. fr:Jacques Monnot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr: Charles-Baptiste-François Vernerey, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr: Alexandre Besson, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.

Drôme

9 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Marc Antoine Jullien, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr:Pierre-Barthélemy Sauteyra, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Joseph Fiacre Olivier de Gérente, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and deportation after peace, 4° oui.
  4. fr: François Marbos, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Joseph Antoine Boisset, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr:Jacques-Bernardin Colaud de La Salcette, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace p, then banishment, but on pain of death if enemies invade the territory of the Republic, 4° yes.
  7. fr: Jean Jacques Jacomin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  8. fr:Jean Raymond Fayolle, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  9. fr: Jean-Marie Martinel de Visan, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.

Eure

11 députés et 4 suppléants

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
François Buzot Yes Yes Death with the Mailhe amendment Yes
fr:Thomas Lindet Yes No Death No
Jean-Baptiste Robert Lindet Yes No Death No
Jean-Michel Duroy Yes No Death No
Richou Yes Yes Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr:Denis Le Maréchal Yes justified Yes Placed in a safe location with his family until peace is concluded, then deportation Yes
fr:Jean-Nicolas Topsent sick sick sick sick
fr:Alexis-Joseph Bouillerot-Demarsenne Yes No Death No
fr:Jacques Nicolas Vallée Yes Abstained Detention until the Republican government is recognised, then expulsion outside the territory of the Republic, except if enemy armies enter French territory, in which case, death. Yes
fr:Louis-Jacques Savary Yes Yes Placed in a safe location with his family until peace is concluded, then deportation Yes
fr:Charles-François Dubusc Made a declaration but did not answer the question fait Yes Detention, then expulsion when public safety requires it Yes

Eure-et-Loir

9 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. Jean-François Delacroix, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. Jacques Pierre Brissot, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until after the ratification of the Constitution by the people, 4° yes.
  3. Jérôme Pétion de Villeneuve, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
  4. fr:Jacques Charles Giroust, 1° abstained and justified his decision, 2° yes, 3° confinement, 4° yes.
  5. Denis Toussaint Lesage, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
  6. fr:Jean-François Loiseau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr: Nicolas Bourgeois, 1° yes as a citizen and not as a legislator, 2° yes justified, 3° sick, 4° sick.
  8. fr:Pierre Jacques Chasles, 1° yes, 2° not justified p, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr: Jacques Frémanger, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Finistère

8 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Alain Bohan, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° yes.
  2. Claude-Antoine-Auguste Blad, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the expulsion of his entire family, 4° no.
  3. fr:Mathieu Guezno, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. Pierre Marec, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° confinement during the war and perpetual exile afterwards, 4° no.
  5. Jacques Queinnec, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  6. fr:Augustin Bernard-François Le Goazre de Kervelegan, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  7. fr:Jacques Tanguy Marie Guermeur, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  8. fr:Jean-René Gomaire, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.

Gard

8 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Jacques-Augustin Leyris, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. Jean-Henri Voulland (Jean-Henri) 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Jacques Jac, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the acceptance of the Constitution by the people, 4° yes.
  4. François Aubry, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death with a reprieve until after the primary assembles have been held to ratify the Constitution, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Joseph-François Balla, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and banishment after peace when public safety will allow it, 4° yes.
  6. Jacques Antoine Rabaut-Pommier, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death with a reprieve until after the ratification of the constitutional decrees, 4° yes.
  7. Jean-Pierre Chazal, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Antoine Berthezène, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until after the primary assemblies have been held or the Constitution has been presented for popular approval, 4° yes.

Haute-Garonne

Speech by Jean-Marie Calès, député from Haute-Garonne, on the punishment of Louis XVI

12 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. Jean-Baptiste Mailhe, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the amendment in my name, 4° yes.
  2. Jean-François-Bertrand Delmas, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Joseph-Étienne Projean, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Emmanuel Pérès de Lagesse, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace, then banishment, 4° yes.
  5. Jean Julien, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Jean-Marie Calès, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr:Antoine Estadens, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace, then banishment, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Louis-Bernard Aÿral, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr:Claude-Louis-Michel de Sacy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° Death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
  10. Jacques-Marie Rouzet, 1° made a declaration but did not answer the question, 2° yes, 3° prison sentence, 4° yes.
  11. fr:Philippe Drulhe, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° banishment on pain of death if Louis returns to France, 4° yes.
  12. fr:Julien-Bernard-Dorothée Mazade-Percin, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° Perpetual confinement, 4° yes.

Gers

9 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Antoine Louis La Plaigne, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr:Louis Bon de Montaut, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. Bernard Descamps, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Joseph Capin, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° confinement until the consolidation of liberty, then banishment, 4° yes.
  5. Barbeau du Barran (Joseph Nicolas), 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr: Joseph Laguire, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr: Pierre Ichon, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  8. Francois Bousquet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr:Jean Moysset, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° Confinement until peace, then banishment, 4° yes.

Gironde

12 députés and 6 substitutes

  1. Pierre Victurnien Vergniaud, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
  2. Élie Guadet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
  3. fr:Armand Gensonné, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Jean-Antoine Grangeneuve (Jean-Antoine), 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, 4° abstained.
  5. fr: Jean Jay, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Jean-François Ducos, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. Pierre-Anselme Garrau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  8. Jean-Baptiste Boyer-Fonfrède, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. Alexandre Deleyre, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  10. fr:Jacques Paul Fronton Duplantier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
  11. Jacques Lacaze, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° Confinement until peace, and until the foreign powers recognise the Republic, after which, banishment, 4° sick.
  12. fr:François Bergoeing, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement, 4° yes.

Hérault

9 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. Pierre Joseph Cambon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. Ange-Élisabeth-Louis-Antoine Bonnier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Jean-François Curée, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
  4. Jacques Joseph Viennet, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° confinement until peace or until the European powers recognise the independence of the Republic; thereafter banishment on pain of death, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Jean-Pascal Rouyer, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Jean-Jacques-Régis de Cambacérès, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° punishment established against conspirators but suspension of the decree and confinement until the cessation of hostilities, at which time the fate of Louis should be finally determined, however immediate execution of the decree in the event of invasion of French territory, 4° yes.
  7. fr: Ignace Brunel, 1° yes, 2° yes, detention in perpetuity, or deportation according to the circumstances, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Claude Dominique Côme Fabre, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr:Pierre Castilhon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement and banishment after peace, 4° yes.

Ille-et-Vilaine

10 députés and 5 substitutes

  1. fr:Jean-Denis Lanjuinais, 1° yes, without being tried, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace and banishment afterwards, on pain of death if he returns to France, 4° yes.
  2. fr:Jacques Defermon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement, 4° yes.
  3. fr:Charles François Marie Duval, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Joseph Marie François Sevestre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr: Jean-François Chaumont, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr: Roch Pierre François Lebreton, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° perpetual confinement, 4° no.
  7. fr: François-Marie Jan du Bignon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until the forthcoming primary assemblies, which may confirm or commute the punishment, 4° no.
  8. fr:Mathurin Jean François Obelin-Kergal, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
  9. fr: Pierre Jean-Baptiste Beaugeard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  10. fr: Jean-François Maurel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until peace and the consolidation of the Republic, followed by banishment, 4° yes.

Indre

6 députés and 2 substitutes

  1. fr:Gilles Porcher de Lissonay, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace and stability of the government, allowing him to be banned forever from the territory of the Republic, 4° yes.
  2. fr:Guillaume Thabaud de Bois-La-Reine, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
  3. fr:Sylvain Pépin, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° detention until the end of the war; deportation after peace, 4° no.
  4. fr:Jacques-Antoine Boudin 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment until the end of the war, then deportation after peace, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Sylvain-Phalier Lejeune, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr:Jean Joseph Eustache Derazey, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement, then deportation when circumstances permit, 4° yes.

Indre-et-Loire

8 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Pierre-Claude Nioche, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr:Jacques Louis Dupont, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Charles-Albert Pottier, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Jean-François Martin Gardien, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace, then deportation, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Albert Ruelle, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
  6. fr:René-Jean Champigny-Clément, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. Claude-Alexandre Ysabeau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  8. fr:Pierre Joseph François Bodin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war; banishment on pain of death, one year after peace, 4° yes.

Isère

9 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Mathieu Baudran, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Louis-Benoît Genevois-Duraisin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr: Joseph Sébastien Servonat, 1° yes, 2° yes, as a legislator, 3* confinement and banishment after the war, on pain of death, 4° yes.
  4. Jean-Pierre-André Amar, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr: Léonard Joseph Prunelle de Lière, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° banishment without delay of Louis with all his family, on pain of death, 4° sick.
  6. fr:André Réal, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, with this punishment to be commuted in calmer times to perpetual banishment, 4° no.
  7. fr:Pierre Joseph Didier Boissieu, 1° yes, 2° as a judge no, as a legislator yes (the “no” vote was recorded), 3° confinement during the war and banishment after peace, 4° no.
  8. fr:Jean-Joseph-Victor Genissieu, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes
  9. fr: Pierre-François Charrel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Jura

8 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. Théodore Vernier, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° detention and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  2. fr: Jacques-Henri Laurenceot, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement and banishment of Louis and all his family after peace, 4° yes.
  3. fr:Antoine Grenot, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° yes.
  4. fr: Claude-Charles Prost, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Pierre-Marie-Athanase Babey, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace, and banishment at that time on pain of death, 4° yes.
  6. fr:Jean-Claude Amyon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr:Étienne Joseph Ferroux, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Marc-François Bonguyod, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention in perpetuity, to be commuted to deportation if circumstances allow, 4° yes.

Landes

6 députés and 2 substitutes

  1. fr:Pierre-Arnaud Dartigoeyte, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Jean-Baptiste Lefranc, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° banishment, and beforehand detention until peace, 4° yes.
  3. fr:Paul Cadroy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention, 4° yes.
  4. Roger Ducos, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Jean Dyzès, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr:Jean-Baptiste Pierre Saurine, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention of Louis and all his family in a safe place until peace is solidly established, unless we then take such a course as we deem expedient, 4° yes.

Loir-et-Cher

7 députés and 5 substitutes

  1. Henri Grégoire, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
  2. François Chabot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Marcou Brisson, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Augustin Frécine, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Claude-Nicolas Leclerc, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° perpetual detention, 4° yes.
  6. fr: Pierre-Étienne Venaille-Bodin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr:André Foussedoire, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Loire

Département not created until November 1793.

Haute-Loire

7 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. fr: Claude-André-Benoît Reynaud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Balthazar Faure, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr: Joseph-Étienne Delcher, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr: Antoine Rongiès, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. Joseph Bonet de Treyches, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° yes.
  6. Armand-Gaston Camus, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission,
  7. fr: Jean-André Barthélémy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

Loire-Inférieure

8 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Jean Nicolas Méaulle, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr:Julien-Urbain-François-Marie-Riel Lefebvre de La Chauvière, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
  3. fr:Étienne Chaillon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement throughout the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  4. fr:François Mellinet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
  5. fr:François-Toussaint Villers, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Joseph Fouché, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr:François-Joseph Jary, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace and perpetual banishment once the republican government is solidly established, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Pierre Coustard, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace and banishment after the war, 4° yes.

Loiret

9 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. fr: Michel Gentil 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until general peace, and the consolidation of liberty, then deportation after the war, 4° abstained.
  2. fr:Jean Philippe Garran de Coulon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement, 4° yes.
  3. fr: Louis-Pierre-Nicolas-Marie Lepage, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  4. fr: Bon Thomas Pellé, 1° yes, not as a judge but as a member of a legislative and political body, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and perpetual deportation thereafter, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Pierre Lombard-Lachaux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° yes.
  6. fr: Pierre Guérin des Marchais, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement until peace, and expulsion after the war, 4° yes.
  7. fr: René-Louis Delagueulle de Coinces, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  8. Jean-Baptiste Louvet de Couvray, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death with a reprieve until the people accept the new Constitution, 4° yes.
  9. Léonard Bourdon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

Lot

10 députés and 3 substitutes

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Jean-Baptiste La Boissière Yes Not justified Death with the Mailhe amendment Yes
fr:Étienne Cledel Yes No Death No
fr:Jean Salleles Yes Yes Confinement until peace and then banishment Yes
Jeanbon Saint-André Yes No Death No
fr:Hugues-Guillaume-Bernard-Joseph Monmayou Yes No Death No
Jean-Baptiste Cavaignac Yes No Death No
fr:Jean-Pierre Bouygues Yes No Confinement Yes
fr:Jean-Baptiste Cayla Yes No Sick Sick
fr:Pierre Delbrel Yes Not justified Death with a reprieve until the Convention has taken measures for general security concerning the Bourbon family Yes
fr:Barthélemy Albouys Yes Yes Confinement until peace and then banishment Yes

Lot-et-Garonne

9 députés and 3 substitutes

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Antoine Vidalot Yes No Death No
fr:Antoine Jean Blaise Laurent Yes Yes Confinement Yes
fr:Pierre Paganel Yes No Death with the Mailhe amendment Yes
fr:Jean-Baptiste-Joseph Claverye Yes Yex Confinement until peace and then banishment Yes
fr:Jean Félix Larroche Yes Yes Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr:Pierre Boussion Yes Yes Death No
fr:Pierre-Jules Guyet-Laprade Yes Yes Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr:Marc-Antoine Fournel Yes No Death Yes
fr:Thomas Noguères Yes Yes Confinement until peace and banishment at a suitable time Yes

Lozère

5 députés and 2 substitutes

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Jean-André Barrot Yes Yes Deportation of Louis, his wife and his two children to one of our most inaccessible islands, guarded by a corps of Parisians until thus measure is judged no longer appropriate No
fr:Alexandre Paul Guérin de Tournel de Joyeuse de Chateauneuf-Randon Yes No Death No
fr:Laurent Servière Yes No Confinement in a secure location, and death only in the event of the enemy invading French territory Sick
Jean Pelet en mission en mission en mission en mission
fr:Pierre-Laurent Monestier Yes No Death, asking that the punishment not be enacted until after peace No

Maine-et-Loire

11 députés and 4 substitutes

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:René-Pierre Choudieu Yes No Death No
Joseph Delaunay Yes No Death No
fr:Louis-Charles-Auguste de Houlières Yes Yes Confinement during the war and deportation after peace, as well as for his family absent
Louis-Marie de La Révellière-Lépeaux Yes Not justified Death No
fr:Urbain-René Pilastre de la Brardière Yes No Confinement until peace, then banishment Yes
Jean-Baptiste Leclerc Yes No Death No
fr:Marie-François Dandenac Yes No Confinement until peace and then banishment Yes
fr:Pierre-Marie Delaunay Yes No Confinement until peace and then banishment Yes
fr:Charles-François-Jean Pérard Yes Not justified Death No
fr:Jacques Dandenac Yes No Deportation of all the prisoners in the Temple Yes
fr:Julien-Camille Le Maignan Yes No Confinement until peace and then banishment Yes

Manche

13 députés and 5 substitutes

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Gervais Sauvé Yes Yes Confinement until peace, and then deportation Yes
fr:Jacques Poisson de Coudreville Yes Yes Confinement until peace, and then deportation Yes
fr:Jean Angélique Lemoine-Devilleneuve Yes No Death No
Étienne-François Letourneur Yes Yes Death No
fr:Bon-Jacques Ribet de Rugneville Yes Yes Death with a reprieve until the expulsion of the Bourbons Yes
fr:Pierre Louis Pinel Yes Yes Detention until peace and then deportation Yes
Jean-Baptiste Le Carpentier Yes No Death No
fr:Édouard-Léonor Havin Yes Yes Death Yes
fr:Siméon Bonnesœur-Bourginière Yes Yes Death with a reprieve until twenty four hours after the decree of accusation against Marie-Antoinette and the banishment of the Bourbons Yes
fr:Jacques Engerran-Deslandes Yes Yes Perpetual detention Yes
fr:Charles-Louis-François Regnault de Bretel Yes No Detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr:André-François Laurence Yes Yes Death with a reprieve for as long as Spain does not declare war and until Germany has given us an honourable peace. Yes
fr:Jean Michel Hubert-Dumanoir Yes Yes Death Yes

Marne

10 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. Pierre-Louis Prieur, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. Jacques-Alexis Thuriot de la Rosière, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° yes, 4° no.
  3. Louis-Joseph Charlier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. Charles-François Delacroix, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Jean-Louis Deville, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr:Jean-Baptiste Poulain de Boutancourt, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until the end of the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  7. Jean-Baptiste Drouet, 1° sick, 2° sick, 3° death, 4° no.
  8. fr:Jean-Baptiste Armonville, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr: François Joseph Blanc, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  10. fr: Jean-César Battellier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Haute-Marne

7 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Louis Guyardin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr:Simon-Edme Monnel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. Louis Félix Roux, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Anne Joseph Arnoux Valdruche, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Guillaume Chaudron-Rousseau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Pierre-Antoine Lalloy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr:Antoine-Hubert Wandelaincourt, 1° recused himself and justified his decision, 2° recused himself, 3° banishment afte4 th3 war, 4° yes.

Mayenne

8 députés et 3 suppléants

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Jacques-François Bissy Yes No Death with a reprieve until foreign powers seek to invade the territory of the Republic; if they do not, the Convention should consider whether there are grounds for commuting the sentence. Yes
fr:François Joachim Esnue-Lavallée Yes No Death No
fr:François Grosse-Durocher Yes No Death No
fr:Mathurin Enjubault Yes No Death with a reprieve until foreign powers seek to invade the territory of the Republic; if they do not, the Convention should consider whether there are grounds for commuting the sentence. Yes
fr:François Serveau-Touchevalier Yes No Death with a reprieve until foreign powers seek to invade the territory of the Republic; if they do not, the Convention should consider whether there are grounds for commuting the sentence. Yes
fr:René-François Plaichard Choltière Yes No Detention until peace and banishment along with his family after the war Yes
Noël-Gabriel-Luce Villar Yes No Detention during the war, and then banishment in perpetuity Yes
fr:René-François Lejeune Yes No Perpetual detention Yes

Meurthe

8 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Jean-Baptiste Salle, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace, then banishment after the war, 4° yes.
  2. François René Mallarmé, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Antoine Levasseur, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Étienne Mollevaut, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention and exile once there is peace, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Germain Bonneval, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr:Luc-François Lalande, 1° I declare that I am not a judge and in consequence I say neither yes nor no, 2° yes, 3° banishment as quickly as possible, 4° yes.
  7. Pierre Michel, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Joseph Zangiacomi, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment when public security permits, 4° yes.

Meuse

8 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. Jean Moreau, 1° oui, 2° oui, 3° bannissement, qui n'aura lieu qu'à la paix, 4° oui.
  2. fr:Jean-Joseph Marquis, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional detention as a hostage, then banishment, 4° yes.
  3. fr:Charles Nicolas Tocquot, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional confinement and banishment after the war, 4° yes.
  4. fr:Philippe-Laurent Pons de Verdun, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Claude Jean Roussel, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until the end of the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  6. fr:Claude Hubert Bazoche, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional detention as a hostage, then banishment, 4° yes.
  7. Sébastien Humbert, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the warn and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Jean-Baptiste Harmand, 1° yes, 2° non, 3° immediate banishment with his wife, his children and his sister, 4° no.

Morbihan

8 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Joseph-François Le Malliaud de Kerharnos, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° provisional confinement and banishment after peace, on pain of death, 4° no.
  2. fr:Pierre Lehardy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention as long as the Republic remains at risk, or until the people accept the Constitution, then banishment along with all the Bourbons, 4° yes.
  3. fr: Vincent Claude Corbel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention as a hostage, unless exceptional measures need to be taken if the territory of the Republic is invaded, 4° no.
  4. fr:Joseph Lequinio, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Yves Marie Audrein, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
  6. Pierre-Mathurin Gillet, 1° oui, 2° non, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment along with his family after peace, 4° no.
  7. fr:Guillaume Michel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war and then deportation, as soon as the safety of the Republic permits, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Joseph Yves Roüault de Cosquéran, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement until the end of the war and expulsion after peace 4° yes.

Moselle

8 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. Antoine Merlin de Thionville, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
  2. fr:François Nicolas Anthoine, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Jean-Pierre Couturier, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
  4. Nicolas Hentz, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Nicolas François Blaux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until peace and then banishment, 4° yes.
  6. fr:Didier Thirion, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr:Joseph Becker, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° perpetual detention, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Jean-Étienne Bar, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Nièvre

7 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr:Jean Sautereau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° absent.
  2. fr:Joseph Charlemagne Dameron, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Jean-Alban Lefiot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Jean Guillaume Guillerault-Bacoin, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:François Paul Legendre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr:Jacques Léonard Goyre-Laplanche, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. Jean-Baptiste Jourdan, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional detention, then banishment when there will be no danger in proceeding to carry out this decree, 4° yes.

Nord

12 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. Philippe Antoine Merlin de Douai, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. Pierre Joseph Duhem, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Eugène Constant Joseph César Gossuin, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
  4. fr:Henri Louis Joseph Cochet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr: Jean-Jacques Fockedey, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention of Louis and his family until the Republic is no longer in danger; then banishment, 4° yes.
  6. fr: Gaspard Jean Joseph Lesage-Senault, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr: Antoine François Carpentier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  8. fr:Philippe Constant Joseph Briez, 1° yes, 2° non, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr: Albert Sallengros, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  10. fr: François-Martin Poultier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  11. fr: Eustache Jean-Marie D'Aoust, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  12. fr: Charles Louis Boyaval, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Oise

12 députés and 5 substitutes

  1. fr: Jacques-Michel Coupé, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Étienne Nicolas de Calon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr: Jean-Baptiste Massieu, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. Charles de Villette, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Jean-Baptiste Charles Mathieu, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Jean-Baptiste Cloots, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr:Louis-François Portiez, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
  8. fr: Charles-François-Marie Godéfroy, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission,
  9. fr: Jacques Isoré, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  10. fr:Antoine Delamarre, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until six months after peace is established, then banishment without the power to return, on pain of death, 4° yes.
  11. François Louis Bourdon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  12. fr: François Siméon Bézard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Orne

10 députés and 7 substitutes

  1. fr:Charles Éléonor Dufriche-Valazé, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the fate of the family of Louis Capet is decided, 4° yes.
  2. fr:Charles Ambroise Bertrand de La Hosdinière, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Pierre François Nicolas Plet-Beauprey, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the National Convention has taken measures to ensure that the family of the Bourbons, particularly Philippe-Égalité, can not damage the establishment of a united and indivisible Republic, 4° yes.
  4. fr:Pierre-François Duboë, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the current war and perpetual banishment after peace, on pain of death if he should return to French territory, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Jacques-Claude Dugué d'Assé, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° banishment, but not to be enacted until after peace, 4° yes.
  6. fr:Charles Thomas-Laprise, 1° yes, 2° abstained, 3° dealt with a reprieve until enemies invade our territory, 4° yes.
  7. fr:Jean-Denis Fourmy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace and deportation thereafter, on pain of death if this sentence is contravened, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Louis Toussaint Jullien-Dubois, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr:Louis-Jacques Collombel de La Roussellière, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  10. fr:Charles Desgrouas, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

Paris

24 députés and 8 substitutes

  1. Maximilien de Robespierre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. Georges Jacques Danton, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. Jean-Marie Collot d'Herbois, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. Pierre Louis Manuel, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment outside Paris, then deportation, 4° resigned.
  5. Jacques Nicolas Billaud-Varenne, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Camille Desmoulins, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. Jean-Paul Marat, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  8. fr:Louis-Charles de Lavicomterie, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. Louis Legendre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  10. fr:Nicolas Raffron de Trouillet, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  11. fr:Étienne-Jean Panis, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  12. Antoine Louis François Sergent dit Sergent-Marceau, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  13. Pierre-François-Joseph Robert, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  14. Jean Dusaulx, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  15. Stanislas Fréron, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  16. fr:Charles Nicolas Beauvais de Préau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  17. Fabre d'Églantine, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  18. fr:Charles-Nicolas Osselin, 1° yes justified, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  19. Augustin Robespierre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  20. Jacques-Louis David, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  21. fr:Antoine Boucher Saint-Sauveur, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  22. fr:Joseph François Laignelot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  23. fr:Jean-Jacques Thomas, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until peace on condition that Louis will suffer death the moment the powers invade our territory, 4° yes.
  24. Philippe-Égalité, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Pas-de-Calais

Speech by d'Armand-Benoit-Joseph Guffroy, député from Pas-de-Calais, on the punishment of Louis XVI

11 députés and 5 substitutes

  1. Lazare Nicolas Marguerite Carnot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. Ernest Dominique François Joseph Duquesnoy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. Philippe-François-Joseph Le Bas, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. Thomas Paine, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until the end of the war and perpetual banishment after the war, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Jean-Baptiste Personne, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  6. fr:Armand-Joseph Guffroy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr:Nicolas François Enlart, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° deportation and detention in one of our islands during the war and banishment after peace, 4° absent.
  8. fr:Philippe-Albert Bollet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr:Antoine-Guillain Magniez, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  10. Pierre Daunou, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° deportation after peace and provisional detention during the war, 4° yes.
  11. fr:Charles-Zachée-Joseph Varlet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement during the war and perpetual banishment after peace, on pain of death, 4° yes.

Puy-de-Dôme

12 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. Georges Couthon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr:Pierre Gibergues, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. Étienne Christophe Maignet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. Charles-Gilbert Romme, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Pierre-Aimable de Soubrany, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Jean Henri Bancal des Issarts, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment as a hostage, to answer with his head if the enemy invades French territory, and after the war, perpetual banishment, 4° yes.
  7. fr:Jean-Baptiste Girot-Pouzol, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace, and then perpetual banishment of the whole family, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Claude-Antoine Rudel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. fr:Joseph Artaud-Blanval, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  10. fr:Jean-Baptiste-Benoît Monestier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  11. fr:Jacques Antoine Dulaure, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  12. fr:Jean Laloue, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

Basses-Pyrénées

6 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. Barthélémy-Jean-Baptiste Sanadon, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, until the Republic is recognised by the powers of Europe; then banishment, on pain of death, 4° yes.
  2. Antoine Conte, 1° I vote yes as a legislator. As a judge I have nothing to say, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, and banishment after peace, on pain of death, 4° yes.
  3. fr:Joseph Pémartin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention, and perpetual banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  4. fr:Arnaud Jean Meillan, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention and banishment after the Republic has been consolidated, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Antoine Casenave, 1° oui, 2° yes, 3° confinement of Louis and his family, until after peace, then perpetual exile, 4° yes.
  6. fr:Étienne Neveu, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention for as long as the war lasts, unless exceptional measures are required depending on the circumstances after peace, 4° yes.

Hautes-Pyrénées

6 députés et 2 suppléants

  1. Bertrand Barère de Vieuzac, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Pierre Dupont de Bigorre, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death with a reprieve until the territory of the Republic is purged of the Bourbons, 4° yes.
  3. Brice Gertoux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  4. fr: Jean-Pierre Picqué, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, with a reprieve until the end of hostilities, 4° yes.
  5. Jean-Bertrand Féraud 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr: Jean Lacrampe, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

Pyrénées-Orientales

5 députés and 2 substitutes

  1. fr:Joseph Guiter, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  2. Joseph Fabre, 1° sick, 2° sick, 3° sick, 4° sick.
  3. Jean Bonaventure Birotteau, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until peace and the expulsion of the Bourbons, 4° yes.
  4. fr: François-Étienne Montégut, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Joseph Cassanyes, 1° yes, 2° not justified, 3° death, 4° no.

Bas-Rhin

9 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. Philippe Rühl, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
  2. fr: Claude-Hilaire Laurent, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. Pierre-Louis Bentabole, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Georges Frédéric Dentzel, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
  5. Jean-Antoine Louis du Bas-Rhin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. Louis François Antoine Arbogast, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until peace, then banishment, 4° abstained.
  7. fr:Philibert Simond, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
  8. fr: Jean-François Ehrmann, 1° sick, 2° sick, 3° sick, 4° sick.
  9. fr: Marie-Frédéric-Henri Christiani, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.

Haut-Rhin

7 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. Jean-François Rewbell, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
  2. fr:François Joseph Ritter, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. François Sébastien Christophe Laporte, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr:Jean-Joseph Johannot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° yes.
  5. fr:Jean-Adam Pflieger, l'aîné, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr: Jean Bernard Albert, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace, then banishment, 4° then.
  7. fr: François Louis Dubois, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention until peace an£ banishment when public safety permits, 4° yes.

Rhône-et-Loire

15 députés and 5 substitutes

Note: In November 1793 this département was divided into Loire and Rhône.

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Charles Antoine Chasset Yes No Detention until peace and then banishment No
fr:Jean-Baptiste Claude Henri Dupuy Yes No Death No
fr:Louis Vitet Yes Yes Detention, and expulsion of "the race of the Bourbons" Yes
fr:Pierre Dubouchet Yes No Death No
fr:Marcelin Béraud Yes Yes Detention until the end of the war, banishment after peace Yes
fr:Jean-Baptiste Pressavin Yes No Death No
fr:Marcelin Moulin Yes No Death with a reprieve until after the expulsion of all the Bourbons Yes
fr:Antoine Michet Yes Yes Perpetual detention No
Eugène Louis Melchior Patrin Yes Yes Detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr:Jacques Forest Yes Yes Detention until peace, and then banishment Yes
fr:Noël Pointe Ues Nt justified Death No
fr:Joseph-Marie Cusset Yes No Death No
fr:Claude Javogues Yes No Death No
François-Xavier Lanthenas Yes No Death with a reprieve if our enemies leave us in peace; in this case Louis should only be exiled outside the territory of the Republic, when the Constitution has perfectly bedded in No
fr:Antoine Fournier Yes Yes Detention until the end of the war, banishment after peace Yes

Haute-Saône

7 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. Charles Claude Christophe Gourdan, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr:Claude-Bonaventure Vigneron, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  3. Claude François Bruno Siblot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with the Mailhe amendment, 4° no.
  4. fr: Claude François Xavier Chauvier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention for the time being, and banishment after peace, 4° no.
  5. fr: Claude-François Balivet, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° provisional dete, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  6. fr:Claude-Pierre Dornier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr: Claude-Antoine Bolot, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° yes.

Saône-et-Loire

11 députés and 6 substitutes

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Jean-Marie Gelin Yes No Death No
fr:Claude Laurent Masuyer Yes No Detention until peace, and then banishment with his whole family No
fr:Jean-Louis Carra Yes No Death No
fr:Claude-Nicolas Guillermin Yes Not justified Death No
fr:Jacques Reverchon Yes No Death No
fr:Ferdinand Guillemardet Yes No Death No
Marc Antoine Baudot Yes Not justified Death No
fr:Mathieu-Nicolas Bertucat Yes Yes Perpetual detention Yes
fr:Antoine Mailly Yes No Death No
fr:Marie-François Moreau Yes No Death No
fr:François-Agnès Mont-Gilbert Yes No Death with a reprieve until the time when the Republic enjoys the full benefits of its new Constitution and peace is securely established; execution of the death warrant in the event of a new invasion of our territory Yes

Sarthe

10 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. Joseph-Étienne Richard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: René François-Primaudière, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Gabriel-René-Louis Salmon, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war, and expulsion from the territory of the Republic after peace and the establishment of the Constitution, 4° yes.
  4. Pierre Philippeaux, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Laurent-Martial-Stanislas Boutroue, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. René Levasseur, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr: Jacques-René Chevalier, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, and banishment after peace, pendant la guerre, 4° yes.
  8. fr: Louis-Joseph Froger-Plisson, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  9. Emmanuel-Joseph Sieyes, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  10. fr: Emmanuel-Pierre Le Tourneur, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Seine-Inférieure

16 députés and 6 substitutes

  1. Antoine Louis Albitte, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Pierre-Pomponne-Amédée Pocholle, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr: Antoine-François Hardy, 1° yes, 2° abstained, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  4. fr: Jean-Baptiste Yger, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment afterwards, 4° yes.
  5. fr: Charles-Robert Hecquet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace, on pain of death, 4° yes.
  6. Jean-Pierre Duval, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  7. fr: Pierre-Charles-Victor Vincent, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, and banishment for Louis and his family when the nation judges it suitable, 4° yes.
  8. fr:Pierre-Joseph-Denis-Guillaume Faure, 1° yes justified, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, 4° yes.
  9. fr: Pierre-Louis-Stanislas Lefebvre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war, and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  10. fr:Charles-Auguste-Esprit-Rose Blutel, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  11. fr:Jacques-Charles Bailleul, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, 4° sick.
  12. fr: Jacques Christophe Luc Mariette, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment thereafter, and nonetheless death in the event that foreign powers make some efforts in his favour, 4° yes.
  13. Pierre Philippe Doublet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention and banishment after the consolidation of the Republic, 4° yes.
  14. fr: Alexandre-Jean Ruault, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention and banishment after the consolidation of the Republic, 4° yes.
  15. fr: Jacques François Bourgois, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment thereafter, 4° yes.
  16. fr: Jacques-Charles-Gabriel Delahaye, 1° yes justified, 2° yes, 3° detention for the present, and banishment after the war, 4° yes.

Seine-et-Marne

11 députés and 11 substitutes

  1. fr:François-Pierre-Ange Mauduyt, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Edme Louis Barthélemy Bailly de Juilly, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° provisional detention and perpetual banishment two years after peace, 4° oui.
  3. fr: Armand-Constant Tellier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. fr: Michel-Martial Cordier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr: Jean-Nicolas Viquy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment until peace and then perpetual banishment, 4° yes.
  6. fr: Marie-Joseph Geoffroy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
  7. fr: Claude Bernard des Sablons, 1° yes, as a holder of a mandate from the people, but I do not wish to fulfil the role of a judge, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the Constitution has been accepted, 4° yes.
  8. fr: Louis-Alexandre Himbert de Flégny, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° confinement until peace and exile at the end of hostilities, 4° absent.
  9. fr: Christophe Opoix, 1° yes, 2° abstained, 3° detention until peace and then deportation, 4° yes.
  10. fr: Jean-Claude Defrance, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  11. fr: Louis-Toussaint-Cécile Bernier, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° imprisonment until the Constitution is accepted. Then the people should decide his fate, 4° yes.

Seine-et-Oise

14 députés and 6 substitutes

  1. Laurent Lecointre, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Nicolas Haussmann, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
  3. Jean Bassal, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. Charles-Jean-Marie Alquier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with a reprieve until a peace is signed, then the punishment to be executed or commuted, but execution of the sentence in the event of a foreign invasion of French territory, 4° yes.
  5. Antoine Joseph Gorsas, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and perpetual banishment after peace, 4° no.
  6. fr: Pierre-Jean Audouin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. Jean-Baptiste Treilhard, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death with a reprieve in the greater interests of the Republic, 4° yes.
  8. fr: Denis Roy, 1° yes, 2° non, 3° death with a reprieve until the people have ratified the Constitution presented to them, 4° yes.
  9. Jean-Lambert Tallien, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  10. Marie-Jean Hérault de Séchelles, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° en mission, 4° en mission.
  11. Louis Sébastien Mercier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention in perpetuity, 4° yes.
  12. Armand de Kersaint, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° deferral of the pronouncement of punishment until after the war; detention until then, 4° absent.
  13. Marie-Joseph Chénier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  14. Charles-François Dupuis, 1° yes, as a representative of the people and not as a judge, 2° no, 3° detention, until the consolidation of the Constitution, at which point the people should pronounce on the fate of Louis, as it may judge appropriate, 4° yes.

Deux-Sèvres

roll call of votes by département on the third question

7 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. Michel Mathieu Lecointe-Puyraveau, 1° yes, 2° yes justified, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Louis-Alexandre Jard-Panvillier, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until peace, then banishment, 4° yes.
  3. fr:Pierre-Jean-Baptiste Auguis, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° imprisonment during the war and banishment after peace on pain of death, 4° yes.
  4. fr:Gaspard Severin Duchastel, 1° sick, 2° sick, 3° banishment (vote accepted despite his late arrival after voting was complete), 4° sick.
  5. fr:Pierre Dubreüil-Chambardel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr: Louis Prosper Lofficial, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
  7. Charles Cochon de Lapparent, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Somme

13 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. fr: Jean-Baptiste Michel Saladin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Louis de Rivery, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention, 4° yes.
  3. fr:Jean-François Gantois, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention until the end of the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  4. André Dumont, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr:Eustache-Benoît Asselin, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
  6. fr:Charles-Antoine Hourier-Eloy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr: Pierre-Florent Louvet, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and perpetual banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  8. fr: Jean-François Dufestel, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  9. fr: Jean-Baptiste Martin-Saint-Prix, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  10. fr: Louis-Alexandre Devérité, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment when the motherland is safe, 4° yes.
  11. fr: Jean-Baptiste Delecloy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the signing of a peace, but the sentence should be carried out if the enemy appears at our frontiers, 4° yes.
  12. fr:Charles Alexis Brûlart de Sillery, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war, then banishment in perpetuity after the consolidation of the Republic, 4° yes.
  13. fr: Landry-François-Adrien François, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

Tarn

9 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. Marc David Alba Lasource, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. Jean-Pierre Lacombe-Saint-Michel, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr: François Solomiac, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  4. fr:Pierre Jean Louis Campmas, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr: Pierre Stanislas Maruejouls, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and deportation after peace, 4° yes.
  6. fr: François Antoine Daubermesnil 1° sick, 2° sick, 3° sick,
  7. fr:Jean-Paul Gouzy, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death with a reprieve until the Convention has determined the fate of the whole Bourbon family, 4° yes.
  8. fr: Henri Pascal de Rochegude, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and banishment after peace, 4° yes.
  9. fr: Jean-Baptiste Meyer, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.

Var

8 députés and 4 substitutes

  1. fr: Jean-François Escudier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° absent.
  2. fr: Joseph Charbonnier, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr:Jean François Ricord, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  4. Maximin Isnard, 1° yes, 2° yes, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. Antoine Joseph Marie d'Espinassy, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr: Jean Roubaud, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. Charles-Louis Antiboul, 1° yes justified, 2° no, 3° detention, as a measure for general security, 4° neither yes nor no.
  8. Paul Barras, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Vendée

9 députés and 3 substitutes

  1. fr: Jean-François Goupilleau, 1° en mission, 2° en mission, 3° death, 4° no.
  2. fr: Philippe-Charles-Aimé Goupilleau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  3. fr: Joseph-Marie Gaudin, 1° yes, but not as a judge, 2° yes, 3° detention during the war and exile after peace, 4° yes.
  4. fr:François Maignen, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  5. fr: Joseph-Pierre-Marie Fayau, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  6. fr: Joseph-Mathurin Musset, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.
  7. fr:Charles-François-Gabriel Morisson, 1° recused himself, 2° recused himself, 3° abstained, 4° abstained.
  8. fr: Charles-Jacques-Étienne Girard-Villars, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° confinement during the war and banishment after peace, on pain of death, 4° yes.
  9. fr:Louis-Julien Garos, 1° yes, 2° no, 3° death, 4° no.

Vienne

8 députés and 2 substitutes

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Pierre-François Piorry Yes No Death No
fr:François Pierre Ingrand Yes No Death No
fr: Jean-Félix Dutrou de Bornier Yes Yes Confinement during the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr:Louis-Charles Martineau Yes No Death No
fr: Jean-Marie Bion Yes Yes Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes
Jacques Antoine Creuzé-Latouche Yes Yes Detention until peace, then perpetual banishment Yes
Antoine Claire Thibaudeau Yes Not justified Death No
fr:Michel-Pascal Creuzé-Dufresne Yes Yes Confinement during the war and banishment after peace Yes

Haute-Vienne

7 députés and 3 substitutes

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr: Jean-Michel Lacroix Yes Abstained Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr:Benoît Lesterpt-Beauvais Yes No Death with a reprieve until the time when enemies invade on our territory; if peace is agreed, then until a time determined by the National Convention or the legislative body. Yes
fr: Pardoux Bordas Yes No Perpetual confinement No
fr: Léonard Honoré Gay de Vernon Yes No Death No
fr: Gabriel Faye Yes Yes Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr: François Rivaud du Vignaud Yes Yes Confinement during the war and banishment after peace Yes
fr: Jean-Baptiste Soulignac Yes Yes Detention during the war and perpetual banishment after peace, on pain of death Yes

Vosges

8 députés and 4 substitutes

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Joseph Clément Poullain de Grandprey Yes Yes Death with a reprieve until the Constitution has been accepted by the people, and the Bourbon family has removed itself from the soil of liberty, unless French territory is invaded by foreign troops. Yes
fr:Joseph Hugo sick sick sick sick
fr:Jean-Baptiste Perrin des Vosges Yes No Death No
fr:Jean-Baptiste Noël Abstained Recused himself Recused himself Recused himself
fr:Joseph Julien Souhait Yes Yes Death with the Mailhe amendment Yes
fr:Jean-Baptiste-Marie-François Bresson Yes Yes Detention until such time as public calm will allow him to be banished Yes
fr:François Couhey Yes Yes Detention and exile after three years of peace, with a prohibition on returning to France, on pain of death Yes
fr:Charles-André Balland Yes Yes Detention, if not perpetual banishment on condition of an advantageous peace, or of pronouncing his death if the sovereign people or some particular circumstances require it. Yes

Yonne

9 députés and 3 substitutes

Députés Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State? Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people? What punishment should be imposed on Louis? Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet?
fr:Nicolas Maure Yes No Death No
Louis-Michel Lepeletier de Saint-Fargeau Yes No Death No
fr:Louis Turreau Yes No Death No
fr:Jacques Boilleau Yes No Death No
fr:Jean Précy Yes Yes Death with a reprieve until the ratification of the Constitution Yes
Pierre Bourbotte Yes Not justified Death No
fr:Jean-Baptiste Hérard Yes Yes Death No
fr:Étienne Finot Yes No Death No
fr:Jean Claude Chastellain Yes Yes Detention during the war and banishment after peace Yes

Results

First question

  • Is Louis Capet guilty of conspiracy against public liberty and attacks against the general security of the State, yes or no?
  • Number of députés in the Convention: 749

Second question

  • Should the judgment of the National Convention against Louis Capet be submitted for ratification by the people, yes or no?
  • Number of députés in the Convention = 749; absolute majority of those voting (not absent, abstaining or recusing themselves) = 355

Third question

  • What punishment should be imposed on Louis?
  • Number of députés in the Convention = 749; absolute majority of those voting (not absent, abstaining or recusing themselves) = 361

Note: During the session on Friday January 18, Gasparin and Delacroix reported errors “in the statement of the decree issued yesterday”. After checking, it turned out that the number of voters and the absolute majority remained the same, but that the votes of the 26 deputies who had voted for death with the Mailhe amendment ought to have been counted as voting unconditionally for death. The number of deputies who voted for unconditional death was therefore 387.

Fourth question

  • Should there be a reprieve of the judgment against Louis Capet, yes or no?[15]
  • Number of députés in the Convention = 749; absolute majority of those voting (not absent, abstaining or recusing themselves) = 347

References

  1. ^ a b c Patrick, Alison. "The trial of Louis XVI (ii): The voting and its implications". muse.jhu.edu. Johns Hopkins University. Retrieved 20 January 2025.
  2. ^ Lodge, Sir Richard (1887). The student's modern Europe, a history, 1453 to 1878. London: John Murray. p. 537. Retrieved 20 January 2025.
  3. ^ a b c d e Thiers, Adolphe (1881). The History of the French Revolution Volume 2. London: Richard Bentley & Son. Retrieved 20 January 2025.
  4. ^ a b c Gazette nationale, ou le moniteur universel Volume 8. Paris: Leriche. 1793. Retrieved 2 February 2025.
  5. ^ Vie privée et publique de Louis XVI, roi de France et de Navarre. Nîmes: chez Gaude fils, imprimeur-libraire. 1814. pp. 329–369. Retrieved 7 February 2025.
  6. ^ Froullé, Jacques-François (1793). List comparative des cinq appels nominaux. Paris. p. 27. Retrieved 20 January 2025.
  7. ^ Trapp, Joseph (1793). Proceedings of the French National Convention on the Trial of Louis XVI. London. p. 174. Retrieved 20 January 2025.
  8. ^ Liste alphabétique de tous les Conventionnels qui ont voté la mort de Louis XVI : dans sa séance permanente des 16 et 17 janvier 1793.
  9. ^ a b c d e f g h i j k l Goudemetz, Henry (1795). Judgment and Execution of Louis XVI. King of France; With a List of the Members of the National Convention, who Voted for and Against His Death. Retrieved 20 January 2025.
  10. ^ a b c d Décembre, Joseph; Alonnier, Edmond (1866). Dictionnaire de la Révolution française, 1789-1799 Volume 2. Paris: Librairie Décembre-Alonnier. pp. 322–326. Retrieved 2 February 2025.
  11. ^ Robert; Cougny (1891). Dictionnaire des Parlementaires. Vol. 4. Paris: Bourloton. p. 241. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
  12. ^ Delmas, Jean (1894). "Une rectification à l'appel nominal dans le procès de Louis XVI". La Révolution française, revue historique. 26: 53–56. Retrieved 31 January 2025.
  13. ^ Villiaumé, Nicolas (1851). Histoire de la re'volution francaise 1789-1796. Paris. p. 187. Retrieved 7 February 2025.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: location missing publisher (link)
  14. ^ Dunn, Susan (2021). The Deaths of Louis XVI Regicide and the French Political Imagination. Princeton University Press. p. 10. ISBN 9780691224916. Retrieved 7 February 2025.
  15. ^ Boudon, Jacques-Olivier (April–June 2014). "Le témoignage de François-Jérôme Riffard Saint-Martin, député à la convention". Annales historiques de la Révolution française. 376: 53–79. doi:10.4000/ahrf.13158. Retrieved 7 February 2025.
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Votes_on_the_death_of_Louis_XVI
No tags for this post.