Back Tango • Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Wikipedia talk:Requests for adminship (Log · Page History)
User Tango (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 271
Minor edits 4 (1.5%)
(Semi-)automated edits 0 (0%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 9.1
Added (bytes)2 105,634
Deleted (bytes) 0
Minor edits · 4 (1.5%)
Major edits · 267 (98.5%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 0 (0%)
Manual edits · 271 (100%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 271 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
2013-01-22 12:35 Diff · History 714 →New RfC: I think you are misunderstanding Jimmy
2010-04-25 13:09 Diff · History 333 →Junior/Senior Sysop:
2010-02-27 00:32 Diff · History 180 →The Rage Conspiracy "RfA":
2009-10-11 05:34 Diff · History 492 →Not so radical idea for RfA reform:
2009-06-28 19:19 Diff · History 327 →Peter Damian:
2009-06-28 19:08 Diff · History 98 →Peter Damian:
2009-06-28 18:34 Diff · History 189 →Peter Damian:
2009-06-28 17:48 Diff · History 247 →Peter Damian:
2009-06-11 17:40 Diff · History 181 →Amount of questions:
2009-06-10 03:43 Diff · History 402 →Amount of questions:
2009-04-01 02:06 Diff · History 117 →Abolish Wikipedia?:
2009-03-07 15:24 Diff · History 73 →Employee accounts:
2009-03-07 15:22 Diff · History 244 →Employee accounts:
2009-03-07 15:19 Diff · History 357 →Employee accounts:
2009-01-22 21:49 Diff · History 125 →The real, real problem with RfA:
2009-01-22 20:30 Diff · History 288 →The real, real problem with RfA:
2008-12-12 20:53 Diff · History 128 →Adminship:
2008-07-10 19:26 Diff · History 174 →A new tool.... RFA Stats:
2008-06-10 16:13 Diff · History 740 →Questions on specific cases:
2008-05-02 23:28 Diff · History 720 →Did someone say stats?:
2008-05-02 18:08 Diff · History 533 →Did someone say stats?:
2008-05-02 15:28 Diff · History 183 →Low level of participation:
2008-05-02 15:26 Diff · History 738 →Low level of participation:
2008-04-25 22:46 Diff · History 191 →Supporters vs Opposes:
2008-04-25 22:34 Diff · History 301 →Supporters vs Opposes:
2008-04-19 01:15 Diff · History 220 →Golden Ticket:
2008-04-18 19:52 Diff · History 429 →Golden Ticket:
2008-04-18 18:17 Diff · History 820 →Golden Ticket:
2008-03-02 17:32 Diff · History 433 →Objection:
2008-03-02 16:59 Diff · History 257 →Objection:
2008-03-01 13:49 Diff · History 808 →Consensus:
2008-03-01 13:42 Diff · History 109 →Proposal to make passing rate of RfB < 90%:
2008-02-16 23:04 Diff · History 334 →"Won't abuse the tools" cliché:
2008-01-10 01:26 Diff · History 213 →Remember, RfA isn't that serious ;):
2008-01-05 19:13 Diff · History 419 →Admins and the right to vanish:
2007-12-02 15:30 Diff · History 265 →Revisiting the idea of a minimum threshold for edits:
2007-10-16 15:54 Diff · History 166 →Subheadings for discussion sections:
2007-10-12 14:25 Diff · History 527 →Strawpoll on a community desysopping process:
2007-10-12 14:21 Diff · History 325 →"Voting is evil":
2007-09-23 01:50 Diff · History 344 →RfC:
2007-09-22 21:05 Diff · History 224 →RfC:
2007-09-22 20:00 Diff · History 154 →RfC:
2007-09-22 17:22 Diff · History 876 →RfC:
2007-09-21 17:15 Diff · History 1,278 →Deadminship: new section
2007-09-21 17:05 Diff · History 517 →What I meant:
2007-09-20 21:56 Diff · History 532 →Abolish bureaucratship as a special status:
2007-09-20 12:02 Diff · History 230 →New Admin Buddy:
2007-09-01 20:32 Diff · History 242 →Discussion board posting:
2007-07-19 23:00 Diff · History 508 →Admimistrator numbers:
2007-06-23 17:39 Diff · History 576 →Even Jimmy Wales wouldn't pass:
2007-06-03 22:25 Diff · History 205 →It's multicolored week!:
2007-06-03 22:09 Diff · History 619 →Any system for users to give feedback about admins?:
2007-05-27 19:59 Diff · History 252 →RFA format idea - new proposal:
2007-04-17 17:04 Diff · History 599 Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Matt_Britt'>→Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Matt Britt: Determining consensus
2007-04-09 15:41 Diff · History 1 →Danny's RfA: fix indent
2007-04-09 15:41 Diff · History 665 →Danny's RfA:
2007-04-06 22:31 Diff · History 357 →Do we have enough admins or not?:
2007-03-22 14:17 Diff · History 1,254 Image:AverageEditCountatRfA-2006.png_blip'>→Image:AverageEditCountatRfA-2006.png blip:
2007-03-21 20:48 Diff · History 212 Image:AverageEditCountatRfA-2006.png_blip'>→Image:AverageEditCountatRfA-2006.png blip:
2007-03-20 14:14 Diff · History 216 →Congratulations:
2007-03-02 14:33 Diff · History 204 →Predicting RFA:
2007-02-26 17:22 Diff · History 688 →Predicting RFA:
2007-02-15 22:11 Diff · History 209 →2006 RfA In Review:
2007-02-10 23:02 Diff · History 280 →Administratorship in other wkipedias:
2007-02-10 12:07 Diff · History 308 →Administratorship in other wkipedias:
2007-02-09 13:25 Diff · History 487 →Help Desk personnel needed:
2007-02-07 13:00 Diff · History 789 →Request for a co-nom:
2007-02-05 10:59 Diff · History 413 →Hot Air ?:
2007-02-03 11:02 Diff · History 738 →"Namespace balance" opposes:
2007-02-03 10:54 Diff · History 559 →Trusted vs Trustworthy: replies
2007-02-02 15:03 Diff · History 1,156 →Provisional adminship???: comments
2007-01-31 18:20 Diff · History 344 →... or, we need more fucking automation:
2007-01-31 16:36 Diff · History 137 →Please don't:
2007-01-29 16:14 Diff · History 238 →Rationale for opposition:
2007-01-28 14:44 Diff · History 179 →Determining concensus:
2007-01-28 00:01 Diff · History 2,408 Determining concensus
2007-01-27 23:45 Diff · History 785 →Rationale for opposition:
2007-01-27 19:51 Diff · History 366 →Oppose:
2007-01-27 15:53 Diff · History 416 →Simpler solutions:
2007-01-27 15:47 Diff · History 642 →Approval:
2007-01-26 18:02 Diff · History 598 →Approval:
2007-01-25 16:11 Diff · History 296 →We have too many inactive bureaucrats:
2007-01-17 20:12 Diff · History 190 →What's wrong with RFA:
2007-01-14 18:04 Diff · History 170 →Subheadings in RfA with a bot updated TOC:
2007-01-14 17:49 Diff · History 147 →Subheadings in RfA with a bot updated TOC:
2007-01-14 17:33 Diff · History 215 →Subheadings in RfA with a bot updated TOC:
2007-01-12 15:51 Diff · History 481 →Secret voting and stuff: You can't !vote in a secret ballot, you can only vote
2007-01-10 20:41 Diff · History 1,122 →This is not even remotely working:
2007-01-10 02:11 Diff · History 557 →Ban asking everyone the same questions:
2007-01-09 15:15 Diff · History 220 →Ban asking everyone the same questions:
2007-01-09 15:12 Diff · History 143 →Ban asking everyone the same questions:
2007-01-09 14:45 Diff · History 218 →Ban asking everyone the same questions:
2007-01-09 14:25 Diff · History 1 →Ban asking everyone the same questions: correcting spelling in my comment about spelling... typical...
2007-01-09 14:22 Diff · History 255 →Ban asking everyone the same questions:
2007-01-09 14:13 Diff · History 119 →Ban asking everyone the same questions:
2007-01-09 14:12 Diff · History 289 →Ban asking everyone the same questions:
2007-01-09 14:05 Diff · History 1,009 →Ban asking everyone the same questions:
2007-01-09 13:31 Diff · History 467 Ban asking everyone the same questions
2007-01-09 13:27 Diff · History 374 →Vote first, ask questions later:
2007-01-09 13:11 Diff · History 494 →Vote first, ask questions later:
2007-01-09 01:38 Diff · History 365 →Anons asking questions:
2007-01-07 02:13 Diff · History 361 →Request for advice:
2007-01-06 02:16 Diff · History 329 →Issues with RFA:
2007-01-05 23:37 Diff · History 606 →Argue with opposer:
2007-01-05 23:31 Diff · History 221 →Policy questions:
2007-01-05 20:26 Diff · History 525 →Policy questions:
2007-01-04 17:26 Diff · History 454 →Bureaucrats:
2007-01-04 13:54 Diff · History 678 →Bureaucrats: crat candidates should participate, not just read
2007-01-04 13:46 Diff · History 352 →Moral Supports: reply to Proto
2007-01-03 14:49 Diff · History 291 →Moral Supports:
2006-12-31 17:10 Diff · History 148 →RE: Request for Adminship:
2006-12-27 21:15 Diff · History 291 →Okay, we need to make it clearer what is expected.:
2006-12-22 17:07 Diff · History 525 →Voting pages over 30 kilobytes: multiple replies
2006-12-21 15:23 Diff · History 351 →Voting pages over 30 kilobytes:
2006-12-14 14:02 Diff · History 261 →Optional questions, redux:
2006-12-14 13:21 Diff · History 185 →Optional questions, redux:
2006-12-14 12:46 Diff · History 352 →Optional questions, redux:
2006-12-13 23:38 Diff · History 665 →Question about RfA standards:
2006-12-13 16:40 Diff · History 102 →Question about RfA standards:
2006-12-13 16:37 Diff · History 208 →Question about RfA standards:
2006-12-10 01:12 Diff · History 790 →Minimum edit count before qualifying for RfA: 2 replies
2006-12-09 19:06 Diff · History 186 →Minimum edit count before qualifying for RfA:
2006-11-29 15:47 Diff · History 739 →Template for candidates user pages: replies and clarification (after 5 edit conflicts)
2006-11-29 14:59 Diff · History 480 Template for candidates user pages
2006-11-29 14:56 Diff · History 989 →Non-Crats Closing Requests?: no problem to fix
2006-11-28 17:57 Diff · History 315 →What's the obsession with %%?: my understanding of the decision
2006-11-28 12:21 Diff · History 162 →24 hour extension incorrectly implemented: can't someone else just correct it?
2006-11-20 12:15 Diff · History 464 →Would compulsory self-nominations find more admins?:
2006-11-17 13:49 Diff · History 525 →RFA is t3h evil!:
2006-11-16 23:36 Diff · History 298 →RFA is t3h evil!: adding a PS
2006-11-16 23:30 Diff · History 761 →RFA is t3h evil!: reply to Rama's arrow
2006-11-16 14:40 Diff · History 1,102 →Co-nominations:
2006-11-15 23:55 Diff · History 813 →Co-nominations:
2006-11-15 19:46 Diff · History 286 →Co-nominations:
2006-11-14 18:57 Diff · History 433 →RFA is t3h evil!:
2006-11-14 13:40 Diff · History 113 →Co-nominations:
2006-11-14 12:30 Diff · History 446 →Co-nominations: how about a "support and vouch" !vote?
2006-11-13 23:14 Diff · History 171 →Co-nominations: the more general the rule, the better
2006-11-13 22:25 Diff · History 150 →Co-nominations: doesn't need to be a co-nom
2006-11-13 19:45 Diff · History 168 →Co-nominations:
2006-11-11 14:08 Diff · History 837 →RfB standards:
2006-11-10 18:03 Diff · History 338 →RfB standards:
2006-11-09 17:16 Diff · History 119 →Links to edit counter - suggestion:
2006-11-08 22:08 Diff · History 145 →Links to edit counter - suggestion: agreed
2006-11-08 16:26 Diff · History 298 →Links to edit counter - suggestion:
2006-11-08 15:32 Diff · History 798 →Links to edit counter - suggestion: attempt at a statistical analysis of server load
2006-11-05 23:35 Diff · History 289 →Limit RfAs?: pointless
2006-10-24 21:07 Diff · History 739 →Generic questions:
2006-10-24 10:39 Diff · History 129 →New kind of semi-Admins: '''the Revert Users''' (RU-Users):
2006-10-08 16:39 Diff · History 386 →Merge with ER:
2006-10-08 11:08 Diff · History 407 →/me rants on annons.:
2006-10-07 23:27 Diff · History 711 →/me rants on annons.:
2006-10-07 10:15 Diff · History 189 →Simple solution:
2006-10-03 21:08 Diff · History 270 →"Encourage," "Discourage":
2006-09-30 23:00 Diff · History 288 →Technical Proposal: add RfA listings to a separate subpage:
2006-09-30 15:38 Diff · History 271 →Technical Proposal: add RfA listings to a separate subpage:
2006-09-29 23:21 Diff · History 595 →Technical Proposal: add RfA listings to a separate subpage:
2006-09-29 22:58 Diff · History 190 →Neutral Opposition. Stop it.:
2006-09-29 15:41 Diff · History 304 →Changes to instruction paragraph:
2006-09-29 13:51 Diff · History 319 →Changes to instruction paragraph:
2006-09-29 10:44 Diff · History 327 →Changes to instruction paragraph:
2006-09-25 12:03 Diff · History 463 →Admin accountability:
2006-09-25 11:28 Diff · History 467 →Admin accountability:
2006-09-22 14:39 Diff · History 648 WP:VIE_point_of_view'>→From the WP:VIE point of view:
2006-09-22 11:49 Diff · History 348 →Trial admin:
2006-09-20 22:49 Diff · History 237 →RfAs per week: moving average?
2006-09-14 16:37 Diff · History 309 →August 2006 WP:RFA in Review:
2006-09-14 15:22 Diff · History 399 →August 2006 WP:RFA in Review:
2006-09-14 12:29 Diff · History 698 →Proposal for a more participatory and transparent promotion process:
2006-09-14 12:19 Diff · History 387 →August 2006 WP:RFA in Review: comment about drop in votes
2006-09-07 12:30 Diff · History 207 →I noticed something strange:
2006-08-25 21:13 Diff · History 375 →Essjay's tool as the new count:
2006-08-25 20:40 Diff · History 263 →Essjay's tool as the new count:
2006-08-25 16:47 Diff · History 443 →Admin Growth chart:
2006-08-25 11:37 Diff · History 328 →An inquiry on a case study:
2006-08-20 20:08 Diff · History 268 →Discussion on splitting the standards page:
2006-07-28 18:11 Diff · History 102 →Section Breaks:
2006-07-28 17:51 Diff · History 332 →Section Breaks:
2006-07-28 17:13 Diff · History 321 →Section Breaks:
2006-07-28 16:57 Diff · History 254 →Section Breaks:
2006-07-28 14:14 Diff · History 235 →Section Breaks: need new feature for TOC
2006-07-24 19:20 Diff · History 448 Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Sean_Black_2'>→Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Sean Black 2: below 75% is fine, but closing after voting is not
2006-07-23 14:28 Diff · History 410 →apparent contradiction:
2006-07-20 16:54 Diff · History 201 →apparent contradiction:
2006-07-19 11:45 Diff · History 215 →Time to counter the drift in standards?: misuse, not abuse
2006-07-14 14:17 Diff · History 152 →Disagree:
2006-07-14 01:12 Diff · History 253 →Disagree: answer to ScienceApologist
2006-07-14 00:26 Diff · History 154 →Foo (wrong question): question to Kim - what's your point?
2006-07-13 18:21 Diff · History 69 →Agree:
2006-07-13 16:48 Diff · History 131 →75% threshold brings entire RfA into question?:
2006-07-13 13:14 Diff · History 506 →75% threshold brings entire RfA into question?: difference between RfA and AfD
2006-07-12 21:40 Diff · History 539 →Clarifying what is meant by 75%: it's a compromise
2006-07-12 20:32 Diff · History 480 →Clarifying what is meant by 75%: suggestion
2006-07-10 21:25 Diff · History 136 →Requests for adminship semiprotected?: no reason not to protect
2006-07-10 19:05 Diff · History 108 →Templates: listing the existing templates
2006-07-10 19:02 Diff · History 122 →Templates: already exist
2006-07-10 19:01 Diff · History 345 →Protected.:
2006-07-10 17:07 Diff · History 479 →Protected.: reply to Splash
2006-07-10 16:53 Diff · History 447 →Protected.: reply to Kim
2006-07-09 20:11 Diff · History 33 →Edits to front matter: {{unsigned}}
2006-07-09 20:07 Diff · History 148 →More issues with explaining votes: no need to write it yourself - solutions already exist
2006-07-03 20:45 Diff · History 359 →The RfA process: not in this case
2006-07-03 14:07 Diff · History 0 →A Suggestion: fixing link
2006-07-03 13:32 Diff · History 196 →A Suggestion: do you mean like RFA Summary?
2006-07-02 16:59 Diff · History 277 →The RfA process: reply to NoSeptember
2006-07-02 16:23 Diff · History 338 →The RfA process: RFA is NOT a vote
2006-06-24 13:39 Diff · History 335 →RfA's:
2006-06-23 17:18 Diff · History 272 →RfA's: Pure vandal-fighters often don't get promoted
2006-06-23 12:25 Diff · History 601 →Expanding the standard question area: people will just read the relevant page and summerise it, thinking for yourself gets you opposed.
2006-06-22 14:00 Diff · History 194 →RfA's: have we had a sudden surge?
2006-06-22 12:32 Diff · History 724 →RfA's: standards are rising
2006-06-20 22:27 Diff · History 681 →Is RfA a vote?:
2006-06-20 15:48 Diff · History 696 →Is RfA a vote?:
2006-06-08 15:58 Diff · History 315 →Possibly stupid suggestion: not broke
2006-06-08 15:54 Diff · History 437 →A change in timing?: just follow the advice from their last RfA
2006-06-05 11:46 Diff · History 323 →A proposal: keep it as it is
2006-06-04 22:22 Diff · History 341 →I beat the nom support!: doesn't add anything, but no chance of changing it
2006-06-04 13:50 Diff · History 104 →AOL IPs and RFA:
2006-06-04 12:32 Diff · History 366 →AOL IPs and RFA:
2006-05-30 00:43 Diff · History 122 →Griffjam closed early:
2006-05-29 23:45 Diff · History 469 →Griffjam closed early: 0 edits = not an editor, so can't stand for admin
2006-05-29 19:50 Diff · History 450 →Admin recall has landed:
2006-05-29 10:52 Diff · History 188 →Voting icons: templates
2006-05-29 10:48 Diff · History 238 →Closure of RFAs by non-bureaucrats: non-buros closing and voting on the same RfA
2006-05-28 23:32 Diff · History 733 →Closure of RFAs by non-bureaucrats: suggestion
2006-05-28 18:34 Diff · History 159 →New: when should I start?:
2006-05-27 23:00 Diff · History 409 →Voting icons: why say "support" when it's under a support header?
2006-05-25 13:13 Diff · History 326 Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Jesus_on_Wheels'>→Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jesus on Wheels:
2006-05-23 15:55 Diff · History 70 Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Jesus_on_Wheels'>→Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/Jesus on Wheels: undelete
2006-05-21 10:29 Diff · History 387 →Templates for Adminiship: asking to nom
2006-05-20 16:13 Diff · History 220 →Administrator Review: reply
2006-05-20 15:52 Diff · History 394 →Administrator Review:
2006-05-19 16:06 Diff · History 397 →Refactoring RfA totals to remove sockpuppets after they have been closed?:
2006-05-17 16:19 Diff · History 589 points_on_RfA_pages'>→Making points on RfA pages:
2006-05-17 12:29 Diff · History 718 points_on_RfA_pages'>→Making points on RfA pages:
2006-05-16 12:34 Diff · History 251 →A minor anomaly?:
2006-05-15 16:01 Diff · History 290 →Another way to take pressure off of RFA?:
2006-05-14 17:19 Diff · History 298 →Another way to take pressure off of RFA?:
2006-05-14 16:17 Diff · History 620 →Apprentice and journeyman admins:
2006-05-14 13:36 Diff · History 350 →Apprentice and journeyman admins: questions
2006-05-13 22:36 Diff · History 693 →Apprentice and journeyman admins: 2 replies
2006-05-13 16:40 Diff · History 408 →Apprentice and journeyman admins:
2006-05-09 22:17 Diff · History 284 →Requests for Adminship needs to be reviewed:
2006-05-09 12:38 Diff · History 235 →Multiple nominators? Poor form or no big deal?:
2006-05-05 10:50 Diff · History 630 →"Moral support":
2006-05-04 17:49 Diff · History 520 →"Moral support": reply to Deathphoenix
2006-05-04 13:05 Diff · History 82 →"Moral support":
2006-05-03 19:52 Diff · History 375 →"Moral support": I agree
2006-05-02 10:40 Diff · History 258 →Joan53's RfA:
2006-05-01 13:54 Diff · History 260 →Joan53's RfA:
2006-05-01 13:11 Diff · History 153 →Joan53's RfA:
2006-05-01 12:49 Diff · History 189 →Joan53's RfA: reply to NoSeptember
2006-05-01 12:43 Diff · History 580 →Joan53's RfA: Suggestion - restrict who can nominate
2006-04-27 17:59 Diff · History 374 →Low-edit-count welcoming template: It's impossible...
2006-04-27 14:57 Diff · History 73 →Welcoming Committee for Newbs: yes, I meant high
2006-04-27 12:42 Diff · History 320 →Welcoming Committee for Newbs: comment on edit counts
2006-04-26 18:53 Diff · History 278 →RfA-induced stress?: re: Emt147
2006-04-25 10:42 Diff · History 472 →HolyRomanEmperor RfA:
2006-04-25 10:39 Diff · History 167 →semi-protecting RfAs: oppose
2006-04-24 18:22 Diff · History 391 →Recusal (again):
2006-04-24 16:51 Diff · History 649 →Easier to support than oppose:
2006-04-24 14:44 Diff · History 264 →Easier to support than oppose:
2006-04-24 14:19 Diff · History 449 →Easier to support than oppose: reply
2006-04-24 14:10 Diff · History 215 →semi-protecting RfAs: slightly off-topic reply about AfDs
2006-04-24 14:02 Diff · History 978 Easier to support than oppose
2006-04-20 17:48 Diff · History 407 →Dissecting the questions: look at contribs
2006-04-19 20:57 Diff · History 612 →Peer review for admin candidates:
2006-04-19 20:44 Diff · History 253 →Does a Bureaucrat check history before closing a RfA:
2006-04-19 20:05 Diff · History 471 →Does a Bureaucrat check history before closing a RfA:
2006-04-18 23:17 Diff · History 767 2 replies
2006-04-18 23:00 Diff · History 548 Peer review for admin candidates
All times are in UTC.
No tags for this post.