Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.
| Page | 0.999... (Log · Page History) |
| User | Tango (Edit Counter· Top Edits) |
| Total edits | 12 |
| Minor edits | 3 (25%) |
| (Semi-)automated edits | 4 (33.3%) |
| Reverted edits | 2 (16.7%) |
| atbe1 | 60.8 |
| Added (bytes)2 | 667 |
| Deleted (bytes) | -69 |
Minor edits
·
3 (25%)
Major edits
·
9 (75%)
(Semi-)automated edits
·
4 (33.3%)
Manual edits
·
8 (66.7%)
Reverted edits
·
2 (16.7%)
Unreverted edits
·
10 (83.3%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
| Date | Links | Size | Edit summary |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009-12-04 21:44 | Diff · History | 2 | Undid revision 329639521 by The Anome (talk) - using the word helps distinguish between the number and the representation of it |
| 2008-11-09 21:41 | Diff · History | 4 | revert back to original (it looks far better inline) and implement simpler fix |
| 2008-10-27 14:37 | Diff · History | 641 | Reverted edits by Htrbabaseball (talk) to last version by Aaron Rotenberg |
| 2008-08-12 20:39 | Diff · History | -4 | revert - "they" refers to the novices mentioned earlier in the sentence, not some abstract "they" |
| 2008-08-12 16:25 | Diff · History | -4 | (reverted) revert - that wording could be interpreting as saying that's a valid way of writing it, which isn't true, it's a meaningless notation |
| 2008-05-23 15:48 | Diff · History | -2 | Reverted edits by 84.132.223.123 (talk) to last version by Melchoir |
| 2008-05-12 13:21 | Diff · History | 18 | elementary mathematics -> elementary, and most higher, mathematics |
| 2008-04-16 21:12 | Diff · History | -1 | Reverted edits by 80.244.83.222 (talk) to last version by Vivio Testarossa |
| 2008-03-31 16:01 | Diff · History | -4 | revert - should say "real", by denseness, rational is still true, but for the rest of of the sentence to make sense, it needs to be real |
| 2008-01-25 11:18 | Diff · History | 2 | rv - I agree, "real numbers" is much better than "quantities" |
| 2008-01-23 17:36 | Diff · History | -58 | rv to the "equal to zero" version - you're just trying to come up with obscure ways of saying "zero", so why not just say "zero"? |
| 2007-12-06 21:13 | Diff · History | 8 | (reverted) +{{fact}} In what number system is 0.999... strictly less than 1? I can think of systems where it doesn't converge, so isn't equal to 1, but isn't equal to anything else either. |
All times are in UTC.