Back Doug Weller • Wikipedia talk:User pages • en.wikipedia.org

Top edits to an page
All edits made to a page by one user, in chronological order.

Page Wikipedia talk:User pages (Log · Page History)
User Doug Weller (Edit Counter· Top Edits)
Total edits 49
Minor edits 0 (0%)
(Semi-)automated edits 2 (4.1%)
Reverted edits 0 (0%)
atbe1 110.9
Added (bytes)2 15,173
Deleted (bytes) -5,344
Minor edits · 0 (0%)
Major edits · 49 (100%)
(Semi-)automated edits · 2 (4.1%)
Manual edits · 47 (95.9%)
Reverted edits · 0 (0%)
Unreverted edits · 49 (100%)
1 Average time between edits (days)
2 Added text is any positive addition that wasn't reverted (approximate)
Date Links Size Edit summary
2024-11-29 16:26 Diff · History 246 →Is this acceptable from a fairly new editor?: Whatever is there, I think good faith means we ignore it and I shouldn't have brought it here.
2024-11-29 14:26 Diff · History 254 →Is this acceptable from a fairly new editor?: new section
2024-07-28 15:15 Diff · History 677 →Should we be saying something about use of the talk page if topic banned from an area?: Reply
2024-07-28 13:23 Diff · History 162 →Should we be saying something about use of the talk page if topic banned from an area?: Reply
2024-07-21 07:13 Diff · History 176 →Proxying while blocked: thanks all, nice to see this concluded
2024-07-20 15:44 Diff · History 479 →Should we be saying something about use of the talk page if topic banned from an area?: new section
2024-07-20 13:33 Diff · History 236 →Proxying while blocked: let's resume this discussion
2024-04-15 12:17 Diff · History 241 →Proxying while blocked: agree, wait undil xrv is closed
2024-04-14 18:12 Diff · History 275 →False claims on user page: Reply
2024-04-14 15:21 Diff · History 276 →Proxying while blocked: pinging those involved in the XRV discussion about me who haven't participated in the discussion there - this discussion needs to continue and the guideline clarified, imho
2024-04-14 15:15 Diff · History 177 →False claims on user page: Reply
2024-04-14 06:57 Diff · History 227 →XRV Notice: add unsigned template
2024-02-27 21:44 Diff · History 413 →Proxying while blocked: no, it’s a live issue not confined to one user
2024-02-27 14:41 Diff · History 292 →Proxying while blocked: add WP:PROXYING, or part of it, to Ownership and editing of user pages
2024-02-27 08:20 Diff · History 465 →Proxying while blocked: new section
2020-04-08 17:14 Diff · History 167 →Is it clear that a user should not have a copy of an article as their talk page?: thx, CIR probably
2020-04-08 09:50 Diff · History 352 →Is it clear that a user should not have a copy of an article as their talk page?: new section
2019-06-21 12:03 Diff · History 277 →Can editors ban someone from their talk page?: an example of someone saying it can't be done and is uncivil
2019-06-21 12:01 Diff · History 370 →Can editors ban someone from their talk page?: new section
2017-12-23 22:06 Diff · History 337 →Proposed change to WP:BLANKING: if it’s not 3rr exempt how do we stop someone using the IP address from edit warring? Removing tpa?
2017-12-20 13:18 Diff · History 322 →Proposed change to WP:BLANKING: templates for educational institutes, military, government and business should stay
2014-08-02 20:05 Diff · History 540 →Guidance on editors reinstating a post added & then removed by another: new section
2014-07-14 16:51 Diff · History 443 →Removing active block notices on IP pages and particularly school IPs: new section
2014-06-13 09:59 Diff · History 724 →Should we allow editors to remove topic ban notices from their talk page despite the guideline?: new section
2014-06-13 07:21 Diff · History 445 →WMF will blank (auto-archive) user talk pages when Flow is turned on: new section
2014-02-13 14:59 Diff · History 228 →Removing block notices at shared IP addresses: for some reason wasn't thinking of blocks as sanctions
2014-02-12 19:04 Diff · History 157 →Removing block notices at shared IP addresses: meant active ones
2014-02-12 13:22 Diff · History 317 →Removing block notices at shared IP addresses: new section
2012-05-25 09:09 Diff · History 732 →Rephrase WP:BLANKING?: comment
2012-05-25 09:04 Diff · History 221 →Comments: no, current sanction notices should remain
2011-08-02 20:43 Diff · History 230 →Linking talk/user pages from editor's blogs: thak
2011-08-02 19:43 Diff · History 193 →Linking talk/user pages from editor's blogs: MfD doesn't seem sppropriate for a talk page, but may use it for the userpage
2011-08-02 10:41 Diff · History 356 →Linking talk/user pages from editor's blogs: new section
2010-10-21 08:51 Diff · History 230 →NOINDEX situations unclear: readers won't always distinguish between what is in article space and what is in user space
2010-10-15 07:05 Diff · History 181 →NOINDEX situations unclear: why should anyone have the right to remove noindex?
2010-10-15 07:03 Diff · History 330 →Set time threshold for deletion of userspace drafts as FAKEARTICLES?: moving articles to incubator a good idea, probably as a default rather than userfication
2010-09-30 08:33 Diff · History 481 →Userspace Vandalism Sandboxes: agreeing that we don't want to invite vandalism, & that such pages may attract BLP violations, copyvio, etc
2010-07-21 17:18 Diff · History 426 →RfC: Sexually provocative content in userspace: not normally an appropriate use of userspace
2010-07-17 14:08 Diff · History -2,657 Undid revision 373973795 by Rohidvai (talk) nothing to do with this page, apparently an attempt to write an article
2010-04-14 16:12 Diff · History 178 →Support: +
2010-04-04 17:48 Diff · History -2,191 Reverted to revision 351779637 by JamesBWatson; rvv. using TW
2010-03-13 21:43 Diff · History 322 →"restoring talk page notices and Whois templates is not a listed exception to the three-revert rule": new section
2010-03-08 14:31 Diff · History 209 →Proposed rename and copyedit: good work
2010-03-07 06:48 Diff · History 267 →Removing the noindex tag: r
2010-03-06 19:05 Diff · History 284 →Removing the noindex tag: new section
2010-01-28 08:40 Diff · History -496 →The Theory: nothing to do with the guideline
2010-01-22 06:54 Diff · History 264 →Editors creating userpages for new editors: reply, agree 'except under exceptional circumstances' is better than my suggestion
2010-01-20 16:08 Diff · History 443 →Editors creating userpages for new editors: will start a new section, advice?
2010-01-11 17:05 Diff · History 551 →Editors creating userpages for new editors: new section
All times are in UTC.
No tags for this post.