The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:37, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Deuş → Chinteni  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete this error: the article has the villiage as "Deușu". Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 17:17, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:29, 11 January 2025 (UTC) Removing my deletion !vote; gazetteer still unmentioned in article. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:53, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep — per this gazetteer entry, it’s both a historical name and a present-day alternate name. — Biruitorul ^Talk 20:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Leaning keep. This could also be added to Deus (disambiguation), despite the accent. BD2412 T 03:33, 14 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Biruitorul's find. It's attested, which makes it a plausible search. Fieari (talk) 04:29, 16 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm _Talk 14:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• AWE Encore → AWE (TV network)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "encore" at the target, and no mention of "AWE Encore" anywhere on Wikipedia for that matter. Currently not a helpful redirect as no information related to this search exists anywhere. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 15:45, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Jay 💬 07:20, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm _Talk 14:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• AWS Step Functions → Amazon Web Services  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "functions" at the target, much less "step functions". People searching for information on Amazon Step Functions instead of the general article on their web services are likely looking for specific topic, one that we don't cover on Wikipedia. The only direct mention of this is in the refs of Amazon SageMaker, to my understanding. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 15:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Jay 💬 07:23, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Jay 💬 21:26, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Axsinaminshi → Acer saccharum  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The only thing I can find about this name is its indigenous origin. Currently not mentioned at the target, not even at Acer saccharum#Use by Native Americans as a section I'd expect to see this in. But it would likely be difficult to cover it, the only place I see this discussed is on the Indigenous Wiki, and the being in question would be a totally different topic, presumably. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 15:40, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, redirects are cheap and its an alternative vernacular name for the species.--Kevmin § 16:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects being cheap is not an excuse to leave readers stranded via a redirect without mention. Not seeing any sources of it being a 1:1 "alternate name", without just being a Lenapé RLANG never addressed anywhere on the entirety of Wikipedia mainspace, which is the story I'm seeing right now. If its a true alt name it can be mentioned in the lead with a source. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:18, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep if it can be verified as a native name and spelling; it does not need to be in the lead, but ought to be mentioned in the article and cited to a source so that readers can see that it's not made up. If it isn't mentioned, the solution is to find an appropriate place in the article and mention it, not to delete the redirect. Native names are worth mentioning, though if they're fairly obscure and not widely known to English speakers, placing them in the lead is probably undue. P Aculeius (talk) 11:54, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The solution is to...: Both of those things can happen though. It can be deleted for now, as long as it is not mentioned, and then recreated when a mention is added to the article. Native names are definitely worth mentioning, but there is WP:NORUSH to do so. In the interim, this redirect currently accommodates a term that is not given context at the target, confusing readers who have no choice but to trust in invisible "correctness" without WP:Verifiability. Ideally I'd like to remove unverified bytes from mainspace. When content is added and the bytes can be verified to a reliable source, remake the redirect. No valuable history is being lost here, this has always been a redirect. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:20, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I do not believe this is the Lenape word for sugar maple. If you google it, that is what comes up - but the sources are things like folk tale websites, girl guides pamphlets, etc. Not sources I would trust on this. Here's a source I would trust: [1]. "Axsinaminshi" is not there. -- asilvering (talk) 02:37, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to List of airports by IATA airport code: K. Hey man im josh (talk) 19:41, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• AYKT → Aropa Airport  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Doesn't appear to be the same airport. This code is apparently associated with Kaintiba Airport, which doesn't have an article, and the listed code at this page for Aropa is AYIQ, which makes the "AYKT" redirect confusing. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 15:36, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Probably retarget to List of airports by IATA airport code: K. Jay 💬 13:34, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Balungan#Types of Balungan. asilvering (talk) 02:39, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Balungan mlaku → Balungan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Balungan mlampah → Balungan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Balungan ngadal → Balungan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Balungan ngadhal → Balungan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Balungan nggantung → Balungan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Balungan nibani → Balungan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Balungan pin mundur → Balungan  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

A number of balungan redirects which aren't mentioned at the target page. People specifying this level of detail will not be able to find it at an article where it is not discussed. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 15:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. The contents were in a section "Types of balungan" that I had written which was deleted without explanation in 2011 without me noticing at the time. I have restored it (diff) and the explanations are there. Rigadoun (talk) 16:21, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the explanation! @Rigadoun:, perhaps it was removed because of sourcing? Because if someone removes it again (which may or may not happen, I don't know) and places the WP:BURDEN on the restorer, these redirects will become problematic again if they stop being addressed at the target. Just wanted to give you a heads up because these might be in a precarious position right now. I'm comfortable withdrawing this nomination now that material has been reinstated. But a source somewhere in this section might be ideal to help keep this content secure on the page, and this might end up back at RfD if someone challenges the section like they did in 2010. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:24, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Refine all to Balungan#Types of Balungan. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 21:40, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment: After further consideration, I realized that did not feel very comfortable letting 7 redirects target a section full of unverified types of balungan, of which may or may not be WP:DUE weight in the grand scheme of the article. So I removed the unverified material (all of it)... but then self-reverted and added some citations because I didn't really want to complicate this after a week. So now the material is cited, and this outcome seems to be good and helps readers get to the information they want. Targeting the types of balungan section as suggested by Skarmory seems like a plus, as an R to section for all of these. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:41, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, mostly.

• Keep List of federal lands in Alaska
• Delete List of federal lands in Arizona
• Delete List of federal lands in Oregon
• Delete List of federal lands in Virginia
• Delete List of federal lands in New York

Keeping the one that is already listified. asilvering (talk) 02:41, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• List of federal lands in Alaska → List of areas in the United States National Park System  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• List of federal lands in Arizona → List of areas in the United States National Park System  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• List of federal lands in Oregon → List of areas in the United States National Park System  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• List of federal lands in Virginia → List of areas in the United States National Park System  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• List of federal lands in New York → List of areas in the United States National Park System  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The target only includes federal lands that are part of the national park system, omitting large national forests and lands managed by the Bureau of Land Management, among others. Delete to encourage article creation. Mdewman6 (talk) 00:14, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• I don't see why we can't stubbify all of these titles right away. BD2412 T 14:35, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
  • Note: I just created a list of this sort under List of federal lands in Alaska. This can be replicated, and expanded with the suggested categories of information. BD2412 T 14:52, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

But like the redirect target, the stub is missing national forests, BLM lands, military lands, etc.. Not opposed to creating list articles at these titles of course, but until someone wants to undertake making a comprehensive list, these should be red. Mdewman6 (talk) 21:37, 9 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So fix it. BD2412 T 03:54, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nom. The newly created list basically duplicates List of the United States National Park System official units#Alaska and related pages, is wildly incomplete since there's far more than NPS areas, and incorrectly includes sites that are affiliated but not actually federal land; this should draftified or also deleted. I don't think these should be hastily made just for the sake of it. Some states instead have a related list of protected areas that includes state lands. Reywas92^Talk 04:18, 10 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, voorts (talk/contributions) 00:21, 16 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Stuybbify/Listify per BD2412 above. Reywas92 above says that this duplicates the Park System article, but the whole point of this is that while there is overlap, this isn't an identical list-- federal lands include more areas than just the parks, although it will include the parks as well. Fieari (talk) 06:52, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Only the Alaska entry has been listified/stubbified. Do we follow suit for the other entries, or delete all?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 12:56, 28 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete all per Reywas92. Creating these lists would be time consuming given the multiplicity of types of federal lands. I agree that attempting to stubbify in order to resolve this RfD would be hasty. Letting these exist as redlinks would resolve the current problem of pointing to an overly specific target while alerting readers to the need to add content. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 16:02, 29 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Additional comments?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 14:16, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm _Talk 14:09, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Nayana Bihugeet → Zubeen Garg discography  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target; only search hit on Google is Wikipedia (an unsourced claim at List of albums containing a hidden track: Z) I tried transliterating this into Hindi and Bengali but didn't get any hits that way either. Cremastra (u — c) 13:50, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Jay 💬 07:29, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Cremastra (talk) 18:48, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• BlSOD → Black screen of death  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Do not see any relation to this title and black screen of death. Searches show no use or mention as well ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 11:37, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Black Screen of Death. Please be aware that there's another redirect with a similar text capitalization that stayed on this site for 5 YEARS as of typing this. Woahglaceon (talk) 13:47, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

(correction: 16 years.) Woahglaceon (talk) 13:49, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Note: second letter is a lower case L, not upper case i. The L separates the acronym from the related but more well known BSOD. From my findings OP is incorrect about search results - lots of usage online for this topic - Keep. BugGhost 🦗👻 19:04, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bugghost could you link some online usage of this name? ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 08:10, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, its mainly tech forums but here are some results: [2], [3], [4], [5] - enough to indicate that this is a used acronym. BugGhost 🦗👻 08:40, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Bugghost Tech forums is not a problem, but all of them exclusively use BlSoD, I do not see any use of BlSOD. It is just too unlikely of a (mis)capitalization. I do not see any point of this redirect. (please ping on reply) ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 13:49, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 02:36, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Cerberus (virus) → SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant#BQ.1.1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• Cerberus (SARS-CoV-2) → SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant#BQ.1.1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

• Cerberus (Omicron) → SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant#BQ.1.1  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:54, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"Cerberus" isn't mentioned at the target, or at Variants of SARS-CoV-2, which makes the first nomination in particular confusing. I can't determine a better target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 11:35, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• This seems a good target- suggest we keep the redirect. I've taken the liberty of adding the statement that BQ.1 and BQ1.1 became known informally as "cerberus" (with refs) at both the Variants of SARS-CoV-2 page and the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant#BQ.1.1 anchor para. HTH. Yadsalohcin (talk) 17:42, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • In which case I support that action and keep. Thanks. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 10:48, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:33, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Plebism → Halkçılık  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Plebism is a (rarely used) word that had defined economic slavery in the Ancient Rome. Folkism is traditional translation of Halkçılık. The redirect was created by a blocked vandal. Delete it. Викидим (talk) 06:12, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. It's not in Merriam-Webster or the OED as an attested English word. Tevildo (talk) 11:03, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 22:27, 10 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the pre-redirect page history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 10:44, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - page history was a CFORK created after the content that is today present at Halkçılık and does not require preservation. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 05:44, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Republic of South Arabia → South Yemen  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This was never used to refer to South Yemen Abo Yemen✉ 09:55, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. This was one creation in a massive spree of Yemeni redirect creations by 反共抗獨光復民國 around the same time. The other "South Arabia" redirects to the same target are: People's Republic of South Arabia, People's Democratic Republic of South Arabia, PDR of South Arabia, PDR South Arabia, PR of South Arabia, PR South Arabia, South Arabian Republic, South Arabian People's Republic, South Arabian People's Democratic Republic, South Arabian PR, South Arabian PDR, DPR of South Arabia, DPR South Arabia, South Arabian DPR, South Arabian Democratic People's Republic, Democratic People's Republic of South Arabia. All should be as scrutinized as this one, no? -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:20, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Tavix Yeah they should all be gone. All of these names are Southern Transitional Council propaganda and none have been used irl and should be deleted Abo Yemen✉ 08:51, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: creator account is blocked on Commons; appears to have a bit of a "thing" for countries and country symbols. Also is there possibly any relation to this or just coincidence/imitation? --Slowking Man (talk) 05:24, 13 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, no reference to a "Republic of South Arabia". Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• What do we do with the mention at List of active separatist movements in Asia#Yemen where the BBC News source does not give any names but only says secessionist Southern Movement, and a note that says These names can be used interchangeably as there is no official name yet? Jay 💬 19:09, 23 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The southern movement uses the flag of the former south yemen and nothing else. Not the same name, not the same party and not even the same ideology. In fact some of the leaders of the movement criticized the ideology 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 08:38, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

How do you propose to modify that section entry? Jay 💬 08:59, 25 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I dont think that it needs any modification. The new separatists (If they manage to separate) should have a new article like the Democratic Republic of Yemen has one. Plus they use the name "South Arabia" or just "the South" more than "South Yemen" so I dont think we have a problem here with deleting those redirects 𐩣𐩫𐩧𐩨 Abo Yemen (𓃵) 09:10, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

My point is if that section continues to mention "Republic of South Arabia" giving that name credibility, then this could turn out to be a Retarget vote and not a Delete vote. Jay 💬 09:52, 28 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. asilvering (talk) 02:43, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• AY Rwanda → Simplice Himbaza  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Artist who performs under the name AY, from Rwanda. Doesn't seem to be referred to as "AY Rwanda" and a quick search of the phrase doesn't bring him up either. Rusalkii (talk) 02:34, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep Users who know him as "AY Rwanda" will likely search for this specific term. Deleting the redirect could lead to frustration and difficulty in locating the correct article. Redirects ensure smooth navigation, especially for less formal or popularly known names. Vikingsam (talk) 10:18, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. My searches don't turn any up any places where this person is known by the name "AY Rwanda" either. Happy to reconsider if User:Vikingsam or others find such references. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:46, 4 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:53, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Same as Presidentman. Delete unless the creator or others find references. Jay 💬 09:02, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:02, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Indian Premier League Purple Cap → List of Indian Premier League awards#Purple Cap  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely search term; should be HISTMERGEd and deleted. Vestrian24Bio 04:22, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the full phrase sees use, including: ...current Indian Premier League Purple Cap holder Mustafizur Rahman..., Indian Premier League Purple Cap is an annual cricket award..., Significance of Indian Premier League Purple Cap, etc. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:35, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:OTHERNAMES and the sources linked above by Tavix. Yuvaank (talk) 09:43, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Purple Cap → List of Indian Premier League awards#Purple Cap  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

"Purple Cap" refers to other things as well. Vestrian24Bio 04:22, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. If there's one other noteworthy use, consider a WP:HATNOTE. If there's multiple other noteworthy uses, consider creating Purple Cap (disambiguation). There's nothing special to say about a cap that is purple, so this shouldn't be disambiguated with cap, for example. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Unless the nominator can show other notable uses of the term "Purple Cap". Redirects are WP:CHEAP. Yuvaank (talk) 09:38, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:01, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Indian Premier League Orange Cap → List of Indian Premier League awards#Orange Cap  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unlikely search term; should be HISTMERGEd and deleted. Vestrian24Bio 04:22, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the full phrase sees use, including: Indian Premier League Orange cap is given to the player..., Brendon McCullum earns Indian Premier League orange cap..., Virat Kohli has only ever won the Indian Premier League orange cap once, etc. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:43, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:OTHERNAMES and the sources linked above by Tavix. Yuvaank (talk) 09:42, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:00, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Orange Cap → List of Indian Premier League awards#Orange Cap  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

"Orange Cap" refers to other things as well. Vestrian24Bio 04:22, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you list them? Searching online I can only see the IPL award, and generic caps that are orange. At the moment I'd say Keep as I'm not seeing any ambiguity with other topics BugGhost 🦗👻 19:08, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. If there's one other noteworthy use, consider a WP:HATNOTE. If there's multiple other noteworthy uses, consider creating Orange Cap (disambiguation). There's nothing special to say about a cap that is orange, so this shouldn't be disambiguated with cap, for example. -- Tavix ^(talk) 20:30, 12 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Unless the nominator can show other notable uses of the term "Orange Cap". Redirects are WP:CHEAP. Yuvaank (talk) 09:37, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was restore. The WP:RDELETE and WP:RETURNTORED opinions supported standalone article scope for the subject. Jay 💬 17:58, 27 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Chongqing No.1 Middle School → Chongqing  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

As per WP:RDELETE points 2 and 10, this redirect not only could plausibly be expanded into into an article (See prior edit history), but also creates significant confusion (The primary article linking to this is Chongqing, which this redirects back to, creating a recursive link) - Additionally, there are next to no pageviews (Prior to proposing this redirect be deleted), suggesting that it's not used frequently Gmoat (talk) 16:41, 17 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per WP:RETURNTORED. It redirects to a list with no context, providng very little information for readers. Ca ^{talk to me!} 01:34, 18 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Thoughts on the page content in the history?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Jay 💬 11:01, 26 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore an old version of the article, maybe this version. Looking at the corresponding zh.wikipedia article, I see lots of sources, so I think the article would likely survive AfD if nominated. Note that "middle school" in China usually just means "secondary school"; from an American perspective, this is more like a consolidated middle and high school rather than a middle school. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 21:02, 27 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Rusalkii (talk) 04:08, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 11:34, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Majas DSL → Tet (company)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No mention of "Majas" in the body of the article. If this was a former name it is never indicated as such; might be a different thing entirely. This was the matter of a Votes for Deletion back in the day at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Majas DSL where it was decided at 2 votes redirect and 1 vote delete that this page should no longer stand. Described as a non-notable entry in 2005, probably doesn't need to be a redirect where it is not described in 2025 either. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 01:06, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. The pre-BLAR version only said Majas DSL is an ADSL service provided by Lattelecom in Latvia. Not appropriate for a mention since even Lattelecom is a redirect to the same target. Jay 💬 09:09, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. As an unopposed deletion nomination. Jay 💬 07:43, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• LY411575 → Hearing loss#Research  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

"LY411575" not mentioned at the target. Apparently is a cell-permeable γ-secretase inhibitor. Definitely not ascertainable from the article on "hearing loss" without context, so delete this redirect which confuses readers by taking them to a location where the context of their search term is not explained. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:56, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hog Farm _Talk 03:27, 18 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Low fat raw vegan → Raw foodism#Raw veganism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Low fat raw veganism → Raw foodism#Raw veganism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Low-fat raw vegan → Raw foodism#Raw veganism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Low-fat raw veganism → Raw foodism#Raw veganism  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at the target. Raw veganism is a redirect and a section that already exists. People who wanted to look up raw veganism, can already do so. Because "low fat" or "low-fat" is never said at the target, individuals searching for this variant of raw veganism would be unable to find any dedicated content. In absence of a specific mention of "low fat" anywhere, delete. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:48, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, no good sourcing for "low fat raw veganism" and it is not commonly referred to. It is not worth redirecting to raw veganism. I doubt anyone is actually searching for these specific terms. Psychologist Guy (talk) 04:00, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete, not mentioned at the target or apparently anywhere on Wikipedia. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 05:19, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. asilvering (talk) 02:44, 24 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Lookout book → Suspect  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

When this redirect was created in 2005, it was as a redirect to watchlist, which can make sense. Look to watch, book to list. However, after being disambiguationified, and turned around to suspect, I'm not sure how much use this redirect has nearly 20 years later. We don't really have a great article on a generic "watchlist" nowadays, as Watchlist (NGO) and others are specific and tailored. Not great to suspect either. So I'm low on ideas, and default to deletion in absence of anything. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 00:39, 11 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Not a comment on the existence of this specific redirect, but I feel like we should have an article on watchlist generally. PARAKANYAA (talk) 23:26, 17 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom in absence of anything. Jay 💬 07:52, 19 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).