The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to SOC. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:13, 17 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• SoC → System on a Chip  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Alpha200807 (talk • contribs) 23:59, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Alpha200807: Please provide a rationale for your nominations. It's completely unclear what you are trying to propose here, and you should make this clear so that other editors can participate in the discussion. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget back to SOC which is a dab page. This used to be the original target for this redirect before the nominator changed it to its current location. Also, it isn't clear what the nominator is proposing (and I assume they're proposing deletion) but retargeting there seems better than deleting. CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:35, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep and add a hatnote to the dab. The target of this redirect has been disputed between System on a Chip and the SOC disambiguation page every so often since 2006 but as far as I can tell it has never been discussed. I've looked through all of the whatlinkshere are there and all but three are either clearly intending the System on a Chip article or disambiguation alerts for people who expected it to lead to that article. Of the other three, one is someone saying it leads to a disambiguation page but they don't know what was intended, the other two it's not immediately clear what meaning was meant, this strongly suggests that there is a primary topic. Of the first 40 results in the internal search engine, the first three are the disambig, the disambig talk page and the redirect. Of the remaining results, 32 are for the chip type, 1 is for State of charge (an article that uses "SOC" and "SoC" inconsistently), and four are irrelevant (they don't use "SoC" at all). Google of course is case insensitive, but from what I can tell with various searches is that System on a chip is the primary topic for "SoC" with that capitalisation; the only competing use is various Summer of Code programmes but when trying with searches like "SoC" computer and "SoC" code the primary topic is still either the chip type or something abbreviated SOC - a capitalisation also commonly used for the summer of code. So, by every measure the chip type is primary for this capitalisation. Thryduulf (talk) 00:48, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget back to DAB page SOC or expect it to collect bad links again (which was how I found it, 4 years ago). Narky Blert (talk) 04:46, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Point of order: is it sporting to simultaneously change the redirect target and add an RfD notice, effectively locking the new target in place for a week? Certes (talk) 10:09, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  In most cases the redirect should generally point at the stable target while being discussed at RfD, but there is an element of m:The wrong version here. User:Alpha200807 should take note of this, but nothing more needs to be done at this point. Thryduulf (talk) 10:21, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to SOC: While SoC is more likely to refer to System on a chip than some of the other listings at SOC, but I don't think it's overwhelmingly the WP:PTOPIC for SoC as State of Charge is commonly enough referred to as SoC as well. TartarTorte 12:55, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget back - Darker Dreams (talk) 06:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Thryduulf (talk) 10:30, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Neighbours: The Adventure → Neighbours  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Not mentioned at target (or anywhere else on Wikipedia). * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:41, 24 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Procedural comment: as this redirect is the result of a WP:BLAR, would AfD be a better venue for the discussion on whether or not to delete the page? Best, ^user:A smart kitten_meow 09:11, 26 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Is restoring the article a good idea? Or would it be best to just delete the redirect?
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 07:19, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Restore - created as a result of an inappropriate BLAR by PresN. The article had sources. A7V2 (talk) 01:11, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The article did not have sources. The article was one of a set of articles created by an editor using chatGPT with no oversight. The user has since been indef blocked as a result. Nothing the article said can be assumed to be true, no sources listed can be assumed to say what the text said they said. Could an article be written on the subject? Maybe. But if you have an article with no usable text, you have no article. --PresN 01:26, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I'm not claiming that the article is in any way suitable, or that it shouldn't be deleted at AfD (nor am I claiming the contrary). Just that presumably since it has sources it is not eligible for speedy deletion, which is the usual criteria for an article (as opposed to a redirect without article history) to be deleted at RfD. Whether it is eligible for speedy deletion due to the creator being indefed would still not change the fact that your BLAR was inappropriate since you targeted it to an article with nothing about the topic, when you should have PRODed or sent it to AfD (or tagged for speedy deletion if that was an option, or just deleted it since you are an admin). A7V2 (talk) 02:07, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• I was mistaken, apologies PresN, I should have looked more carefully to see that the subject is in fact discussed at the current target in the section Neighbours spin-offs#Other merchandise, though not with this name. It would be better then to refine to that section, adding this name explicitly there. A7V2 (talk) 02:51, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  That's not talking about Neighbours: The Adventure. That's talking about Neighbours (video game), which was similarly redirected as AI-generated. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 23:35, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, _signed, Rosguill ^talk 21:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: My Google search shows this is a real thing, but also that this is not related to the one mentioned at the target. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 18:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per WP:REDLINK. - Darker Dreams (talk) 07:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per the explanation provided by the BLARer. Jay 💬 06:05, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The fight for the drug market in the Russian darknet → Russian darknet market conflict  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Implausible synonym and search term for this topic. This page was created at this title and was appropriately moved 30 minutes after its inception to comply with MoS. "The fight for the" is not an title-intro that will likely be replicated in search queries to reach the article's key points, being the "Russian darknet market conflict". Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 21:24, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 22:55, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. - Darker Dreams (talk) 07:08, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted by Ponyo per criterion G5. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:07, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Thaw Daggerslash → The Edge Chronicles#The Quint Trilogy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Misleading & unhelpful: the target tells the reader nothing about the character. Edward-Woodrow • talk 20:24, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Alextejthompson (Ping me or leave a message on my talk page) 22:07, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. We appear to have no content about this character anywhere. Thryduulf (talk) 10:44, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep: No longer the case, I have updated article's list with information on the character. 7even8eight (talk) 16:33, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep: per @7even8eight. - Darker Dreams (talk) 07:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, better than before. Jay 💬 06:09, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was deleted by Ponyo per criterion G5. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 00:06, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Spiker (The Edge Chronicles) → The Edge Chronicles#The Twig Trilogy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Goom (The Edge Chronicles) → The Edge Chronicles#The Twig Trilogy  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Misleading & unhelpful: the target doesn't tell the reader anything about the character. Edward-Woodrow • talk 19:55, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete (and the disambiguated redirect below). Someone using this search term knows that the character appears in The Edge Chronicles, which is all they will learn from the target, so this is not a useful redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 10:48, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Keep: No longer the case, I have updated article's list with information on the character. 7even8eight (talk) 16:30, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: (Because these are all names of characters listed at the target page with the same qualifications and anchor, but also includes a disambiguator, I have bundled these last two characters that Thryduulf's deletion vote refers to. Could have maybe been included with the above, but the rationale being discussed is currently separate for each.) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:02, 3 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 20:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:07, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• SM-A515F → Samsung Galaxy A51  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Seems to be a random part of a longer code used for this model of cellphone. Edward-Woodrow • talk 13:57, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep and tag as {{R from EXIF}}, which explains the purpose of redirects like this. Thryduulf (talk) 14:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep: Not a random part, the "longer one" is an extension of this. Every Samsung Galaxy has a SM-(5 letters) code like this. CLYDE ^{TALK TO ME}/_{STUFF DONE} 18:46, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per @Thryduulf. - Darker Dreams (talk) 07:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Windam (Ultra monster) → Ultraseven  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Unhelpful: no mention at target. Edward-Woodrow • talk 13:51, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Iranian Communist Authority → Persian Socialist Soviet Republic  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

A shortlived breakaway state in northern Iran is a far cry from the "Iranian Communist Authority". No hits on Google help its case. Delete. Edward-Woodrow • talk 13:46, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: Seems to be a reference to a video game, Hearts of Iron IV, but it is not mentioned specifically at that article. TartarTorte 13:52, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Latin America Highland Games → Brazilian Scottish Highland Games  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

No evidence that this was ever called "Latin America Highland Games" featuring this name (partially due to the article having no references), and no incoming links from mainspace. Google results for this term show exclusively Wikipedia mirrors. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:37, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. Hey man im josh (talk) 14:07, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Café noisette → Noisette  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

An entry not mentioned at target disambiguation page; it existed as a redirect to a dab page featuring an external link for the topic, which has since been removed. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:32, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Not mentioned anywhere. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:42, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. Hey man im josh (talk) 12:04, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Triple murder → Murder  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Triple-murder → Murder  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

Triple murders are not covered at the target article, despite "double murder" being a redirect there. In my eyes, double is all that is needed, as it is all that is mentioned, and it doesn't seem necessary to go higher. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 06:23, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - there are incoming links, and it's a reasonable target even if higher numbers aren't explicitly mentioned. Geromino Spork (talk) 16:33, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep due to the links and a lack of WP:SURPRISE. If someone is searching "triple murder", they would not be surprised to end up at an article for Murder even if it does not explicitly mention triple murders. -- Tavix ^(talk) 17:34, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. There's only one incoming link from an article, and that article can be fixed. Better to have this come up as a redlink when someone tries to add it to an article, so they have notice that they probably shouldn't be linking that. --Trovatore (talk) 04:20, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per Tavix. Why should someone not be linking "triple murder" to "murder", given that the target article contains content about multiple murders (even though it doesn't explicitly use the term) and if anyone tried to create a separate article about triple murders it would just redirected to the murder article (or outright deleted, depending on the NPP). Thryduulf (talk) 08:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • I just can't see an occasion where it's a useful thing to link. The reader who sees "triple murder" in blue is entitled to expect that the target treats triple murder as a distinct thing, as opposed to, say, double or quadruple murder. It doesn't seem likely to me that we're ever going to do that. --Trovatore (talk) 15:10, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    I agree it seems unlikely that we would do that, but "unlikely to do" is not the same as "should not" let alone "must not" - and even if it was a "must not" internal links are not the only reason for redirects to exist. Thryduulf (talk) 17:40, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Well, they're one of exactly two reasons, I'd say, the other being directly entering the term in the search box. If it were deleted, entering "triple murder" in the search box would bring up a page of hits that might be more useful than just sending you to the murder article. --Trovatore (talk) 18:54, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to spree killer, a concept that covers multiple murders in a short time. Double murder and Multiple murder would do well to be retargeted to this place, too. If there's a problem with this idea, then keep; it's obviously related and a reasonable target. Per Geronimo Spork's comment — if there were ever links, they still exist in past revisions, regardless of the current revisions tracked in Special:WhatLinksHere, so if Geronimo's right, you can't say that this is unused. Nyttend (talk) 05:39, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Yeah but -- they were always overlinks, and contained no information, so what is lost? There is no good reason to link the phrase "triple murder". --Trovatore (talk) 06:54, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  They seem equally likely to refer to spree killer, serial killer and murders that are technically neither (e.g. killing multiple people at the same time), so unless we're disambiguating I think murder is best target for all of them. Thryduulf (talk) 11:29, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. - Darker Dreams (talk) 07:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Waka Waka (This Time for Africa) with a hatnote to the DAB. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:51, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Waka Waka → Waka waka  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Retarget to Waka Waka (This Time for Africa) since it is now the WP:PRIMARYTOPIC. RMXY (talk) 06:20, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• @RapMonstaXY No, it isn't the primary topic. If you think it should be, then propose a page move first. See WP:RM. PamD 11:41, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • @PamD: the "(This Time for Africa)" is not a disambiguator but part of the full title of the song, a page move is neither required nor appropriate. Thryduulf (talk) 12:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

    Ah, sorry, I misunderstood. PamD 21:31, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per nom and add a hatnote back to the disambig. On the first three pages of Google results only one is not related to the song, and the majority of pages 4 and 5 are also related. The last result was related to the Wakka Wakka language but none of the others were for anything we have coverage of (e.g. an instragram account and a non-notable takeaway in Glasgow). Thryduulf (talk) 12:17, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom. I'm surprised we don't have an article on Waka Waka Bang Splat, which might be another candidate for the primary topic, but, as we don't, the song is best. Tevildo (talk) 20:02, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:58, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per nom and M<assviews: [1]. Put a redirect hatnote at the new target. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:45, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget: per WP:SMALLDIFFS. Clyde _{[trout needed]} 21:52, 15 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Harlem station. (non-admin closure) CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:55, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Harlem station, Forest Park, Illinois → Harlem station (CTA Blue Line Forest Park branch)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Currently orphaned. Not particularly useful, given the possible ambiguity with Harlem/Lake station. Delete. 162 etc. (talk) 06:15, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate. When a redirect is ambiguous, deleting isn't the proper route. Nyttend (talk) 05:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  A redirect to the existing dabpage Harlem station would be fine. 162 etc. (talk) 14:02, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Harlem station. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Harlem station as that target is a dab page anyways. (non-admin closure) Duckmather (talk) 15:16, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Harlem station, Forest Park → Harlem station (CTA Blue Line Forest Park branch)  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Currently orphaned. Not particularly useful, given the possible ambiguity with Harlem/Lake station. Delete. 162 etc. (talk) 06:10, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate. When a redirect is ambiguous, deleting isn't the proper route. Nyttend (talk) 05:35, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Harlem station. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 18:49, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Harlem station per Shhhnotsoloud and the other similar RfD immediately above. CycloneYoris ^talk! 06:56, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:48, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Will Buie Jr. → Bunk'd  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• Will Buie Jr → Bunk'd  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 
• William Bradford Buie Jr. → Bunk'd  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]

This person has starred in multiple works of media besides this singular show. I would suggestion deletion in order to encourage article creation, WP:REDLINK. (As an example, they also are featured in In the Tall Grass (film) which receives twice the pageviews of the current target.) Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:36, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom. Darker Dreams (talk) 07:24, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Barrister (disambiguation). (non-admin closure) Duckmather (talk) 15:30, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• The Barrister → Shaun Wallace  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

While this is mentioned in an infobox for alternate names, to me it looks like a vague term and seems to be more-often-than-not used to refer to barristers, as much as you would call a judge "The Judge" when the occasion permits. Looking up "the barrister" did not show much for Shaun Wallace, although I wouldn't expect it to as it was dominated by other barrister related results. The subject with the most frequent results seems to be about The Barrister Magazine, although this magazine does not yet have an article, but the rest seems mostly Barrister related. In any case, such a (unorthodox?) nickname seems quite broad in subject matter and unidentifiable of a single person, as from my understanding, it feels like any barrister could be known as "The Barrister" depending on who you ask. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:22, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambiguate create a barrister (disambiguation), point this to it, add Wallace to that page, along with barrister, Ayinde Barrister, Barrister Baachaa, Barristers (Qualification for Office) Act 1961 -- 65.92.244.127 (talk) 03:51, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambig - Darker Dreams (talk) 07:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was disambiguate — Expedition to Tibet (disambiguation) moved over redirect by NmWTfs85lXusaybq. (non-admin closure) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 18:43, 25 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Expedition to Tibet → British expedition to Tibet  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

There have been multiple expeditions to Tibet (German, Chinese). It does not seem as if there is a primary topic among these, and China has a disambig page for the multiple expeditions. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 05:00, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to disambig, per nom. - Darker Dreams (talk) 07:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Disambiguate between the German and Chinese (dab) pages per nom. Jay 💬 06:22, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

  Disambiguate by moving per Thryduulf. Jay 💬 06:55, 19 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Disambig / note I've moved the Chinese expedition to Tibet dab page to Expedition to Tibet (disambiguation) and broadened it to include the British, German and Japanese expeditions. That should be moved to the base title over this redirect. Thryduulf (talk) 10:28, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 18:47, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Pierre Shum → 2023 World Series of Poker results#Results  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Redirect created by a now-banned sock to a list of Poker winners where the target does not appear. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 04:15, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Thryduulf: This one does not qualify for WP:G5, namely: A page created before the ban or block was imposed...will not qualify under this criterion. This page was created 19:49, 17 July 2023, and the sockmaster, The Micronesian-Corsican Revolution (talk · contribs), was not blocked until 16:37, 11 September 2023. -- Tavix ^(talk) 14:53, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

@Tavix: Oops, I forgot to check that. Undeleted. Thryduulf (talk) 19:06, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Duckmather (talk) 03:43, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Mob vote → Minecon  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

The article says a few of the conventions featured a "mob vote", but a) this isn't helpful to the reader, and b) this is no way the WP:PTOPIC. (NPP action) Edward-Woodrow • talk 20:05, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: This particular user has created a bunch of Minecraft related redirects lately which were ultimately deleted, see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 September 14#Allay. Fork99 (talk) 20:34, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The article does more than just mention the mob vote; it explains what it is and gives several details. What could be the primary topic other than the Minecraft event? –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 23:01, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment Mob rule -- 67.70.25.175 (talk) 04:27, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • "Mob vote" is not mentioned at Mob rule, and I can't find any evidence that it is ever called that. I am really bad at understanding politics, but doesn't an ochlocracy—by definiton—not have a voting system? –CopperyMarrow15 (talk | edits) Feel free to ping me! 18:23, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  • Minecraft is the primary topic, also you can just write a hatnote. Sebbog13 (talk) 19:01, 14 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:59, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per CopperyMarrow15 - "mob" and "vote" in the usual sense contradict each other. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:16, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per CopperyMarrow15 - at best mob rule would warrant a hatnote. - Darker Dreams (talk) 08:10, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was retarget to Charitable organization#Scotland. (non-admin closure) Duckmather (talk) 03:39, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Charities in Scotland → Category:Charities based in Scotland  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

I'm not sure that a cross-namespace redirect to a Category, which is not a list, is suitable when there is an article, Office of the Scottish Charity Regulator, which discusses charities in Scotland. A link to Category:Charities based in Scotland could be added to the See also section. Or the redirect could be deleted: note that Charities in England, for instance, does not exist. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 19:09, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget to Charitable organization#Scotland This seems like the best target, given that it has the broadest coverage. I'm hesitant to target the regulatory agency since the topic of "Charities in Scotland" is broader than a single organization. - Presidentman talk · contribs (Talkback) 19:48, 1 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete seems overly generic so search results may be better. Crouch, Swale (talk) 20:03, 2 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, CycloneYoris ^talk! 01:59, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Retarget per Presidentman - that target does indeed discuss charities in Scotland. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 02:16, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget to Charitable organization#Scotland per Presidentman. --Lenticel ^(talk) 00:59, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]
• Retarget per Presidentman. - Darker Dreams (talk) 08:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 03:41, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• 2-hydroxychromen-4-one → 4-Hydroxycoumarins  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• 22105-09-5 → 4-Hydroxycoumarins  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

This compound is not a 4-hydroxycoumarin derivative (hence the "2-hydroxy" in the name) and is not mentioned anywhere enwiki. The second redirect is the CAS number for the compound. The creation of these redirects may have been exacerbated by a misleading search result on PubChem [2] which attempts to relate these terms to 4-hydroxycoumarin. Delete both. Mdewman6 (talk) 01:18, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete both. The first is a tautomer of 4-hydroxycoumarin, but neither the current target nor 4-hydroxycoumarin discuss tautomerization. The second seems to be an uncommon CAS number for 4-hydroxycoumarin (more often 1076-38-6) and if you must have CAS numbers as redirects it should point to the specific compound it refers to rather than the family of compounds and be tagged with {{R from CAS Registry Number}}. Moreover, I feel like CAS numbers are not useful redirects on Wikipedia for the cost of their maintenance and are better used searching proper chemical databases or chemical supplier websites. ― Synpath 19:55, 10 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . ✗plicit 03:41, 16 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

• Bene BeraK → Bnei Brak  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ]
• Bene BeraḲ → Bnei Brak  (talk · links · history · stats)     [ Closure: //delete ] 

Delete. The target's name, being originally written in Hebrew, can be transliterated in many ways, but a concluding capital "K" is implausible in all of them, as far as I can see. (One has two pageviews this calendar year, and the other has three.) Hebrew doesn't have capital and miniscule letters, so it definitely doesn't reflect capitalisation in the original. These are old redirects (one created in 2007 by a human, and the other in 2008 by a bot), but they're years newer than the CamelCase convention that's responsible for a few funny capitalisations, like AustraliA (example) or UuU. Unless someone can find evidence to the contrary, there's seemingly no reason to conclude that these are likely to have been linked off-wiki in the past sixteen years, so we're not really at risk of breaking links by deleting these. Nyttend (talk) 00:35, 9 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as an archive of the discussion. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review).