March 11

This is a list of redirects that have been proposed for deletion or other action on March 11, 2011

Vaguely plausible ethnic group redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. JohnCD (talk) 22:23, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete These redirects are confusing at best, and original research at worst. They represent potentially plausible migration patterns, but there's no evidence that the migrants represented by the redirect title are actually considered part of the group discussed at the target article. And in any case, the target articles don't discuss such migration. cab (call) 10:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Completely implausible ethnic group redirects

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was delete all. JohnCD (talk) 22:16, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. These redirects are confusing at best, and original research at worst. They represent grossly implausible migrations. The target articles don't discuss such migration, and such content couldn't even be added because there are no sources describing that these ethnic groups migrated in such a fashion. cab (call) 10:46, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Assburger

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 22:13, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I see this as offensive and it should be deleted. PaoloNapolitano (talk) 10:10, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

It is NOT a misspelling. "Asberger" and "Aspberger" are appropriate misspellings. PaoloNapolitano (talk) 14:37, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep-This is easily a conceivable misspelling. Saying it is "not a misspelling" because it may be offensive is, in all honesty, ludicrous.--Fyre2387 (talk • contribs) 18:21, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep- Just because it is offensive to an individual or group doesn't mean that naive young people wouldn't misspell it this way. 129.137.107.176 (talk) 22:02, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Keep: reminds me of a commercial featuring a man in an interview accidently referring to the interviewer, Mr.Dumass, as Mr. Dumb ass, instead of Mr. Doomas, because he was unsure of how to pronounce it. Anyways this is a plausible search term, and it is unlikely to offend those that do not come across it.AerobicFox (talk) 07:18, 14 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

HMS Titanic

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was keep. JohnCD (talk) 22:10, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion, Titanic was never commissioned into the Royal Navy. Mjroots (talk) 07:54, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

Lol aids

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was speedy delete WP:CSD#G3 vandalism. JohnCD (talk) 10:43, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Not a plausible search term. Shovan Luessi (talk) 03:05, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.

William Garretson

The following is an archived discussion concerning one or more redirects. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on an appropriate discussion page (such as the redirect's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was retarget to Charles Manson#Investigation. JohnCD (talk) 22:36, 18 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I believe this redirect is completely wrong. Garretson has no relationship in anyway to Charles Marson or to his "family". He was living behind (?) Sharon Tate's house when the murders occurred, and had no involvement on them, either. I suggest either redirecting to Sharon Tate's murder section, or deleting it. Diego Grez (talk) 03:04, 11 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above is preserved as the archive of an RfD nomination. Please do not modify it.
Allikas: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2011_March_11
No tags for this post.