I think we should merge this page, WP:IAR? into WP:IAR. This page is a very simple page that doesn't say much, but I think when we merge IAR? into this page, it will give readers a better understanding of what IAR is and what it is not. Interstellarity (talk) 22:15, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Oppose - This is one policy that's useful to keep simple and to the point IMO. As with the spirit of the rule, it makes for a nice contrast with the rest. — Rhododendrites ^talk \\ 22:21, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose - It's been proposed many times, but keeping this very simple page simple has consistently been the consensus. --Onorem (talk) 22:24, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose WP:IAR? and WP:IAR is a textbook example of why we have Template:Supplement - that is instructional creep.Moxy🍁 22:28, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose as per comments above. The separation is fine and simple is not always best.--Andrew Lancaster (talk) 22:30, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose, per above. Randy Kryn (talk) 03:46, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Oppose In addition to the other reasons, it's strength is its brevity, focus and directness. Like the Google home page, the blankness is the most coveted place to want to put something to get noticed. Or like preferring to smoke in the no-smoking section because there are no smokers in it. :-) North8000 (talk) 03:55, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  the possessive form of "it" is "its"!! consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:04, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  Its all good. Randy Kryn (talk) 11:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  take a cold shower with your clothes on consarn _{(prison phone) (crime record)} 11:53, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

  I fixed it. North8000 (talk) 16:52, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Nah, Rjjⁱⁱⁱ (talk) 04:01, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]