The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 23:39, 21 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Westbury Park, Staffordshire (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is a housing development, should be a clear delete since they are rarely notable. I have found no sources that make this development any different. Does not pass WP:GNG. Rusf10 (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Rusf10 (talk) 22:13, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Lacks references proving that it meets WP:GNG. MrsSnoozyTurtle (talk) 23:15, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No indication this passes GEOLAND2 with significant coverage. Reywas92^Talk 23:46, 14 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:GNG. Lacks news coverage. Purosinaloense T/K 11:34, 15 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: not enough coverage to pass general notability guidelines. Fails GNG. TheDreamBoat (talk) 05:57, 17 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.