The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ritchie333 ^{(talk) (cont)} 19:07, 23 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Victoria sur le Parc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A planned condominium development project that might finish sometime in 2023. Any questions?   // Timothy :: talk  06:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Quebec-related deletion discussions.   // Timothy :: talk  06:24, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Textbook WP:TOOSOON and it reads like WP:PROMO for potential buyers. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 13:00, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. AleatoryPonderings (talk) 13:01, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom --Devokewater@ 13:11, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• keep Yes, one question. Does the nominator have any policy-based reason to delete this? A nomination of "Any questions?" is not! Denzil1963 (talk) 21:51, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Reply to Denzil1963: yes, I do. Have a wonderful day.   // Timothy :: talk  23:04, 15 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.