The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete (closing as G3). Hoax - no need to let this sit on the wiki for all seven days. Many thanks to the nominator for catching this one. Neutrality^talk 04:58, 8 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Venus Tower (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is either a hoax, or refers to a fictional building of no apparent notability. Either way, it does not appear to be verifiable. BelovedFreak 10:07, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:33, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete as a hoax. No trace of this building, its city or its state found outside the Wikipedia article. • Gene93k (talk) 16:35, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Definitely a bizarre hoax - in fact, you could make a game out of counting the number of clues that it's a hoax. Delete anyway. 81.142.107.230 (talk) 16:56, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - location does not exist [1] Exit2DOS ^{• Ctrl • Alt • Del} 18:05, 7 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.