The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete/redirect. Since it's unsourced WP:OR I'm deleting the article and recreating it as a redirect. Beeblebrox (talk) 15:25, 4 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Spodi (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unreferenced and non-notable OR. The title is just one of hundreds of synonyms for "punch" applied to inexpensive alcoholic mixed fruit drinks common at American college parties. No real content worth saving to merge, though it'd be great to see the topic covered (with sources) in the Punch article. Survived AfD back in 2005, but standards are much higher now. MatthewVanitas (talk) 06:21, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or Redirect to Punch. Apparent neologism. Not notable enough to merit an individual article... a few ghits at most, no realistic prospect of finding reliable sources. Catfish Jim & the soapdish 06:54, 19 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:53, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:22, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I would have to agree that at best this can be merged with Punch. No sources and none likely to be found. This is just one of many other names for the same drink.SBHans13 (talk) 16:02, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Punch. Definite WP:NEO, contributes no new content, not worth saving. — Chromancer ^talk/_cont 16:39, 26 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.