The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Courcelles (talk) 23:17, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Southam Chambers (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Searches on News, Newspapers, Scholars, Highbeam and JSTOR turned up nothing to establish notability. Books did have a few mentions of the building, but they were of the list type, simply showing the existence of the building. Nothing to really show the notability of this particular building. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 18:45, 26 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:48, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. SwisterTwister talk 21:49, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete for now as there's simply not much for an article even if we wanted one, aside from some Books and browser links. SwisterTwister talk 21:50, 28 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• delete fails WP:GNG. Being an old building doesn't cut it. LibStar (talk) 10:00, 29 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.