The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) – Train2104 (t • c) 19:14, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Skyland İstanbul 1 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article fails to meet the notability guideling: "Buildings, including private residences and commercial developments may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Only one source is listed, and it seems to be from the company responsible for the building. Eddie Blick (talk) 02:14, 2 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep tallest buildings in Istanbul/Turkey make it notable. Here is a news source [1], and independent skyscraper database [2], a real estate news source [3], and there are certainly many more in non-english. MB 04:18, 3 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Turkey-related deletion discussions. Smmurphy^(Talk) 14:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - seems to be plenty of coverage in Turkish language sources. Smmurphy^(Talk) 14:03, 8 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 03:09, 9 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.