The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 23:12, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ryan Hegarty (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP: NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 05:14, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey -related deletion discussions. WeAreAllHere _talk 05:41, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Talk 08:49, 11 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails WP:HOCKEY per nom. – Nurmsook! ^talk... 23:12, 18 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as he clearly falls well short of the criteria needed for an article. Deadman137 (talk) 03:00, 20 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails WP:HOCKEY, and fails WP:GNG. Flibirigit (talk) 14:50, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Doesn't appear to meet either WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 16:16, 21 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails GNG. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 00:11, 22 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as (unfortunately) does not satisfy WP:NHOCKEY or WP:GNG. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 22:00, 25 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.