The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 03:20, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Roldán+Berengué, arqts. (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is irredeemably spammy: it's a resume with a bunch of URLs linking to projects. I have little doubt that the company and/or the individual people are likely notable, but this article in its current form is completely unacceptable. I would have deleted it summarily, but in this forum perhaps someone can use some of the info to make real articles out of it. Drmies (talk) 22:08, 12 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:05, 13 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment: Agree the article is a mess with many issues. So many its hard to know where to start. For example there are two BLP's embedded in the article that either need to be spun off or deleted as non-notable. If all the awards listed are real, this might be a notable organization. It would take some research to find out one way or the other.-- — Keithbob • Talk • 20:08, 19 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Squeezing together a pair of unsourced BLP articles does not make the result any more notable or better-sourced. --Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 01:14, 22 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.