The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No quorum, so a WP:SOFTDELETE Martijn Hoekstra (talk) 21:07, 11 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Robert Sprunt (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable architect, no reliable in-depth news sources about the individual. With a name like that, any significant online coverage should be easy to spot. I can't see any. Sionk (talk) 13:12, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Weak Delete Seems like a pretty standard career for an architect. However, he does seem to have some journal hits here and here, among others. I'm not too familiar with his field, so I'm not sure if mentions like that would establish notability, but my guess would be no it does not. MisterRichValentine ^(talk) 15:13, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:23, 23 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, →Στc. 02:09, 29 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.