The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 07:44, 26 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Point West Corporate Plaza (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't appear to be a notable office complex. Sources provided are almost all primary (announcement by real estate group of sale, local news announcing purchase, official website) except one directory listing. No substantial coverage located on search. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 07:29, 19 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nomination.--89.206.114.25 (talk) 00:16, 20 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:13, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete, does not meet WP:NBUILD, although striking in appearance, this 1981 complex (not 2000s as suggested by the article, a bit of promo anyone?) does not have the wikisignificance (lack of sources/awards found) to warrant an article. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:14, 21 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.