The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ‑Scottywong| [confess] || 19:54, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Odessa Hotel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This hotel is WP:Run-of-the-mill and fails WP:NBUILD and WP:GNG Wikiwriter700 (talk) 16:21, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ukraine-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:44, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 16:45, 7 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete we need an end to all articles on businesses sourced only to that businesses website.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:32, 9 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. Lacks the significant coverage required by WP:GNG and WP:NBUILD. --TheSandDoctor ^Talk 06:31, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Weak delete - does get some coverage in Ukrainian and Russian media due to being abandoned since 2011 [1] [2] [3] but I'm not convinced it's enough for GNG Spiderone 10:04, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.