The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Cirt (talk) 19:18, 7 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Michael Karowich (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Article claims some notability, but I'm not sure this passes the bar. Passportguy (talk) 20:11, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. Various searches show someone known somewhat by other Canadian architects, but no indication of notability outside of that group. Two things in the article also hint at a lack of notability: his current job (works for the city of Mississauga, a Toronto suburb), and his book is published by a vanity publisher: [1] Hairhorn (talk) 20:29, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete It really falls on the last step. Highest Heights (talk) 20:31, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. -- TexasAndroid (talk) 22:35, 31 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.