The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep per WP:SK#1. Nomination withdrawn with no outstanding delete !votes. (Non-administrator closure) NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 02:38, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Matti Suuronen (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Originally it was tagged for CSD A7 but moved here. A very short article (17 words) with no references. I think it also qualifies for A1. But it is better to discuss it here. It seems to me that the subject doesn't pass WP:GNG in the current state. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 16:07, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep or redirect to Futuro if the architect is not deemed independently sufficiently notable. See, e.g., [1], [2], [3]. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 18:20, 31 July 2014 (UTC) Finnish Wikipedia has more: [4]. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 18:39, 31 July 2014 (UTC) I !vote for keep per WP:CREATIVE "The person is known for originating a significant new concept, theory or technique" and "The person's work (or works) either (a) has become a significant monument, (b) has been a substantial part of a significant exhibition, (c) has won significant critical attention, or (d) is represented within the permanent collections of several notable galleries or museums".24.151.10.165 (talk) 19:37, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• In this case a merge will be the best idea. Since this article is very short and translation is needed. Merging it with Futuro article can help for now. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 18:58, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've subsequently taken some information from the above references and assembled those with other prefabricated parts from Finnish Wiki and Commons. I'm unsure about it's longterm performance (i.e., it needs more editing) but somehow I think Suuronen would smile at the construction process. In its current state, I do not feel that a merger would be helpful, but opinions can definitely differ. 24.151.10.165 (talk) 14:54, 4 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Finland-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:21, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 1 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdraw nomination The improvements and expansion made by the author, it now meets GNG so I withdraw. Jim Carter (from public cyber) 11:45, 5 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.