The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete as non-notable and more. —Doug Bell ^talk 07:11, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Masters of Sound (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Non-notable. Original research. No reliable sources to support importance. Fails WP:SOFTWARE. Andre (talk) 21:39, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

• delete - indeed, nn --61.114.193.19 12:46, 10 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as insufficiently notable. No coverage of subject by reliable, third-party published sources. -- Satori Son 05:56, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nom. FirefoxMan 16:44, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No signs of WP:V being satisfied, smacks of being a less than notable game. QuagmireDog 23:14, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - didnt win any AGS awards [1] so non-notable i'm afraid 195.114.94.194 23:27, 12 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete No assertion of notability. —ShadowHalo 05:54, 14 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.