The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) –Davey2010^Talk 03:05, 14 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Mansion in Milonice (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:GEOFEAT. Dewritech (talk) 19:59, 7 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poland-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. NORTH AMERICA¹⁰⁰⁰ 13:24, 8 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment I could hardly verify the existence of this mansion, otherwise an 18th ceuntry architecture will be considered unquestionablely notable.--Antigng (talk) 00:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. It is a listed historic building (you'll need to search for Miłonice) and as an 18C wooden mansion I think it probably passes the notability bar. Here's a photo. -- Necrothesp (talk) 14:27, 9 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Now it meets WP:GEOFEAT C1.--Antigng (talk) 08:51, 10 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.