The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 18:13, 5 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

LIFX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A product that came out, got a blip of coverage, then got acquired. Fails WP:20YT and WP:NPRODUCT, because notability should have significant independent coverage and be enduring. Graywalls (talk) 18:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Companies, Products, Technology, and Australia. Graywalls (talk) 18:35, 26 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Fails WP:NPRODUCT. Its creator is also up for deletion Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel C. M. May. LibStar (talk) 01:40, 28 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. It was a company with 21 or so employees and a total budget of maybe $14 million? It was bought out by a company engaged in a monopoly? WP:MILL. Bearian (talk) 11:05, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A large amount of these devices were sold across the US. At least 1M. If a consumer looks at the label on one of these devices, they should be able to find information about it. This fits in the core mission of the encyclopedia. 73.12.95.124 (talk) 06:04, 3 March 2025 (UTC) — 73.12.95.124 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. [reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.