The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Consensus to delete - does not meet established notability guidelines (talk→ BWilkins ←track) 16:08, 10 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jordan Weal (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Contested prod. WHL Conference All-Star (not league-wide) is not a notable season-ending award. Canada Hky (talk) 22:08, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 00:57, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: I don't understand the prod removal. Following many a long argument asserting that Criterion #4 of WP:NHOCKEY didn't actually mean what it said, and that "best defensive defenseman" and "academic rookie of the month" constituted "preeminent honors," we nailed exact language down. "First Team All-Star" is quite explicit, and doesn't mean "conference All-Star." Ravenswing 02:09, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per Ravenswing. -DJSasso (talk) 19:00, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.