The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Club de Tenis Puente Romano. Spartaz ^Humbug! 22:40, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hotel Puente Romano (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Like it is currently described a usual hotel in Marbella, Spain, nothing extraordinary. Only Reference is a tourist guide entry. CommanderWaterford (talk) 14:00, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete or merge/redirect to Club de Tenis Puente Romano. Per nom, while this is undoubtedly a very swanky hotel, it doesn't appear to meet the WP:CORP or WP:GNG guidelines on its own. A news/book search suggests that the two main "claims to notability" are that the hotel (and its facilities) is used as a base by famous people. And that it has an ancient Roman bridge on its grounds. On the former, I would note that notability isn't inherited (otherwise, every hotel that ever hosted a famous guest would have its own entry). And that stuff could be covered in the Club de Tenis Puente Romano article anyway. And, on the latter, if that bridge is notable as a cultural heritage or national heritage or protected structure, then it should have its own article. And any notes on the hotel/environment be covered there. Rather than the other way around. Otherwise, per nom, we have an otherwise ROTM entry with no indication of notability. Acting, as has been the case over the years, only as a magnet for promotional/advertising guff. Guliolopez (talk) 15:24, 25 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Merge Merge with Club de Tenis Puente Romano and have a paragraph on the hotel there.† Encyclopædius 07:16, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Spain-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 03:21, 27 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge per nom and above --Cornellier (talk) 12:52, 2 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.