The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) ─ The Aafī ^(talk) 14:53, 17 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Gediminas Baravykas (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article makes no claim to notability since its creation in 2010. Fails WP:GNG. 4meter4 (talk) 14:04, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Lithuania-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 14:27, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I didn't found sufficient coverage that meets general notability guidelines. Rondolinda (talk) 20:12, 24 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. The larger article on Lithuanian Wikipedia would suggest he is notable. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:03, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the English version doesn't yet list any sources, but the other language versions do, although many links are broken and an article cited in the Lithuanian version appears to merely mention that a street has been named after him [1]. (I can't read Lithuanian so I depend on machine translation). However: The Wikipedia library gives access to the Allgemeines Künstlerlexikon Online via de Gruyter [2] which has an article on the subject. Vexations (talk) 19:31, 2 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep the ru.wiki version provides more sources. He was clearly notable, had an impact on Lithuania and received at least one important award. Mccapra (talk) 05:22, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clearly notable person, and not being able to find english sources should not be a reason for deletion.Jackattack1597 (talk) 10:37, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
• Comment. Thank you all for finding good content in foreign language references, and it's great that notability can be proven. However, I will point out that the text in the article still makes no claim to notability, and is therefore still in danger of deletion no matter how many sources we find per speedy deletion rule WP:A7. For those who found content with a claim to notability, please take the time to add a sentence or two with a source just to say more than he was an architect. There are many architects in the world and many do not pass GNG. Why does this particular architect deserves an encyclopedia entry? What makes this architect notable? We have to have some sort of assertion of notability in the article in order to keep it.4meter4 (talk) 14:57, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
  • 4meter4, I added the source I suggested above. Thanks for the reminder. Vexations (talk) 21:30, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.