The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was merge to Fenway Hotel. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont) 16:25, 24 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Fenway Cottage (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article has no citations, nor could any be found online. Appears to be a real estate description of a property, rather than a significant location. Xevus11 (talk) 16:15, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Florida-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 17:45, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Move back to userspace as it was a draft. I'm unsure from my research that it should just redirect to Fenway Hotel. I'm not getting anything solid about the cottage except that Mainsail owns FENWAY COTTAGE LLC. – The Grid (talk) 18:20, 16 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 02:53, 17 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Added cites regarding guests, reworded a couple of sections to eliminate the real estate flavor. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NewarkShark (talk • contribs) 00:23, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. North America1000 22:41, 19 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I agree it is proper to merge with Fenway Hotel entry, as it was a part of the hotel where the rich came for “season”, albeit not a room but a house to lease.

Am I able to take this out of public publication to my personal space where I can engineer integration with Fenway Hotel entry? As a noob I appreciate any and all help. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by NewarkShark (talk • contribs) 15:14, 23 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No tags for this post.