The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can . plicit 07:02, 24 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Kuwait, Warsaw (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable embassy building. The notability standard for buildings is WP:NBUILDING, which essentially requires a WP:GNG pass with significant coverage in multiple independent secondary sources. None of the sources present in the article are independent as they are all Polish government sources. A WP:BEFORE search for additional sources turned up only brief mentions in the official Kuwaiti state media such as this one and this one.

There is no Polish-Kuwaiti relations page to merge to, nor is there likely to be anything that could sustain the notability of such a page. FOARP (talk) 17:34, 11 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:24, 18 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
No tags for this post.