The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep - disruption by blocked sockpuppet. EJF (talk) 12:02, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Dimond District, Oakland, California (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Unreferenced Cholga^talK! 09:36, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Being unreferenced alone, does not mean an article should be deleted. Vivio Testarossa^{Talk Who} 09:56, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep JWB (talk) 14:31, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Notable. Wikidemo (talk) 19:10, 29 February 2008 (UTC)...and speedy close. Nomination is by a confirmed sockpuppet, whose recent deletion spree was part of the abusive behavior that got him indefinitely blocked.[1] Wikidemo (talk) 18:20, 1 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. If it's unreferenced, then someone else can add references and improve the article. Is this neighborhood at least as notable as the rest of Oakland's neighborhoods, then we can keep the article. --Elkman ^(Elkspeak) 20:46, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per above -- Anonymous Dissident^Talk 23:50, 29 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.