The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was ‎ keep, withdrawn. —David Eppstein (talk) 08:36, 24 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Contemporary Psychoanalysis (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

nn journal tagged since 2019 --Altenmann >talk 21:19, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdrawn --Altenmann >talk 06:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academic journals, Psychology, and New York. Skynxnex (talk) 22:08, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep: included in major selective databases (Scopus, Social Science Citation Index), clear meet of NJournals. The article is admittedly in a deplorable state, but AFD is not for cleanup. If I find time in the coming days, I'll go over the article (but can't guarantee that I find that time...) --Randykitty (talk) 17:18, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • <sigh>AFD is not for cleanup - judging from the frequency of this "battle cry" in AFDs, de facto AFD is for cleanup: I do not know any other means to attract attention. Clearly, tags do not work. --Altenmann >talk 18:21, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

• There is no deadline. In addition, improving an article on an academic journal is not so hard if you follow our journal article writing guide. --Randykitty (talk) 22:48, 22 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  • I was not aware of the guide, thank you. --Altenmann >talk 06:01, 23 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]