The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 07:41, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comparison of cricket and baseball (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Lack of verification and probability of original research, both of which breach core policies Brian (talk) 09:14, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Baseball-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Cricket-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 18:59, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep. A notable comparison to make, given baseballs roots from leading American cricket clubs and cricketers. The article already has some references, it's these types of articles which could easily reach FA one day due to the sheer abundance of sources. Howzat?Out!Out!Out! (talk) 19:24, 3 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - There are a number of references already in the article and plenty of sources describe at least some aspects of comparisons between the 2 sports. For example [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7]. So WP:V is not an issue, and any WP:OR can be addressed via editing. Rlendog (talk) 16:25, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy keep - Just viewing a few of the articles listed above by User:Rlendog, the topic is clearly verifiable: [8], [9], [10]. Northamerica1000^(talk) 21:37, 4 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

• Withdraw nomination. I change my vote to keep as the points raised above are convincing. I'll ensure the article is adequately tagged. --Brian (talk) 04:44, 5 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.