The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No clear consensus with regards to notability. Given that no discussion has occurred for 14 days, a third relist seems unwarranted. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:56, 30 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Circle Square Manchester (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am not convinced that the sources are sufficient to entablish notability; either self-published or from specialist publications. And the article reeked of spam; I've cleaned out a bit, but I suspect this is the work of a paid editor. Or somebody just cut n pasting stuff from some load of corporate guff; much of the phrasing bore no resemblance to English as used by people.TheLongTone (talk) 14:57, 8 January 2020 (UTC) TheLongTone (talk) 14:57, 8 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:09, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 08:09, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:13, 15 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep, the majority of sources are iffy at best but Manchester Evening News is certainly a WP:RS and bot BusinessLive and Insider Media Ltd both also have apparent qualities of RS. This means there is significant coverage in independent, reliable sources, or WP:GNG compliance. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 05:19, 16 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.