The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. -- Patar knight - ^chat/_{contributions} 22:04, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Brian O'Hanley (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

fails WP:GNG; fails WP:NHOCKEY Joeykai (talk) 20:38, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails GNG and NHOCKEY. Minor player who only succeeded in school/mid-professional level which isn't enough to pass our criteria. Being named to the ECHL All-Star Game (not First or Second All-Star Team) and Cincinnati Cyclones Defenseman of the Year is not considered a preeminent honour. Way off of the 200 game mark for AHL and being part of an NCAA championship team doesn't qualify him for NHOCKEY. All I can find is routine coverage of him regarding contracts and being named to the ECHL All-Star Game which is just WP:ROUTINE and not in-depth enough for GNG. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:00, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Ice hockey-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Massachusetts-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 00:32, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete: HickoryOughtShirt?4 said it all, and at this point and a couple hundred AfDs down the road, WP:DOLOVISCREATEDIT ought to exist. Ravenswing 06:42, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• In fairness to Dolovis, when this article was created his all-star selection may well have met NHOCKEY. Not that it matters now. Rlendog (talk) 17:16, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• delete Doesn't have the coverage to meet the GNG and the article, which is just a list of stats, fails to show he meets WP:NHOCKEY.Sandals1 (talk) 14:25, 26 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete does not meet our riduculously low bar of notability for hockey players.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:55, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails NHOCKEY and GNG. Rlendog (talk) 17:13, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as non-notable as above. --Lockley (talk) 18:11, 29 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete fails NHOCKEY. CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 03:01, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.