The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 10:39, 11 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Breadline Cafe (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Perfect example of a WP:REFBOMB for a run-of-the-mill venue. Article is sourced to the restaurant's own website, Google Maps, and brief routine mentions in travel guides of the county. No evidence of WP:SIGCOV. Reywas92^Talk 09:45, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Washington-related deletion discussions. Reywas92^Talk 09:45, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete The article contains no indication as to why this might be notable, so it's no surprise that significant coverage can't be found.----Pontificalibus 13:01, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Lack of any WP:SIGCOV, does not meet WP:GNG. --qedk (t 桜 c) 15:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 20:59, 4 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment. It's not listed on the NRHP, and it is not included in any NRHP historic district, i can see that from National Register of Historic Places listings in Okanogan County, Washington. But it seems like a historic building. The current article mentions there being "historical items" about it, i think meaning local newspaper articles about its history. Certainly the current version of article is inflated and needs to be edited down. Some source about history would bring this more clearly over the line to being notable, IMHO. --Doncram (talk) 22:53, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 06:45, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

• Merge. No significant coverage, as noted above. Since it's in a historic district, and there is some coverage in reliable sources, I'd merge it into Omak, Washington. Bearian (talk) 17:37, 7 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete -- Omak is a settlement of under 5000 people, whose article is surprisingly long for its size. I seems to me a small NN cafe, no more significant than any other shop there. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:26, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per above. Newspapers.com search only finds minor mentions in The Spokesman-Review. Searching on the long-term tenant of the building, Omak Beverages finds almost nothing (except the Cafe saying they are in the former Omak Beverages building). With WP:MILL coverage of the restaurant and no coverage of the "historic" building, nothing left but delete. MB 17:57, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete this subject lacks SIGCOV. Primary sourced. Lightburst (talk) 18:38, 8 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.