The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Article is not in good shape and could use some attention of a good editor. Randykitty (talk) 17:39, 28 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Brad Friedmutter (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability - there is a .PDF of an industry magazine interview from an award. Other sources seem to be press releases and a mention in a gossip article. There are no refs for the claims in the career section. EBY (talk) 00:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - there appear to be sufficient sources available to support notability (see for example profile in the Las Vegas Sun), plus the major awards. The career section is for the most part sourceable with the refs already included. Nikkimaria (talk) 00:48, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Person seems notable enough, but the article needs clean up especially in the career section. Most of this section needs sources and re-writing as it sounds too promotional. Bananacognac (talk) 03:47, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - I'll make some changes to the career section to get it more tone neutral. 19:01, 20 November 2014 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Alxtronic (talk • contribs)

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:20, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Meh. I'd merge his wife's article into his, if we must keep one or the other. Bearian (talk) 17:24, 21 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.