- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. -- Cirt (talk) 00:40, 28 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Berney/Fly Bed and Breakfast (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:ADVERT article not notable enough to merit inclusion, unless I'm missing something with the NRHP claim. I didn't find it listed at National Register of Historic Places listings in Mobile, Alabama, although it may be part of one of the historic districts, such as Oakleigh Garden Historic District. Even if that is so, I don't think that would merit its own article, especially one that's pretty much a B&B advert. JaGatalk 08:17, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. Thryduulf (talk) 14:21, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete. It is definitely not individually listed on the NRHP , although the Mobile Historical Commission does show it as a contributing building to the Oakleigh Garden Historic District. I don't believe this is enough to establish its own individual notability, there are several hundred other historic contributing buildings on this one street alone. Nothing in the article suggests any other notability. Altairisfar 14:56, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete as merely being one of hundreds of contributing buildings to a historic district is insufficient to warrant a separate article without significant coverage. I found brief mentions in The New York Times and Washington Post but only a couple of sentences in a larger travel article, not in any way focused on the B&B. Perhaps a paragraph could be saved for the district's article in a merge? - Dravecky (talk) 15:16, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment It appears the article creator specialized in B&B spam: see user contributions. --JaGatalk 18:09, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 18:34, 20 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.