The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 23:19, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Baral Agreement (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This article is a den of original research. If you actually read the article, it does not significantly cover the agreement at all, except in one unsourced section. For the most part, it duplicates the content of 1955 Poonch uprising. The sources in the article do not verify statements made within, and searches for "Baral agreement" come up empty. There are serious WP:competence is required issues with the article creator and I will probably file an WP:ANI report soon Mach61 21:30, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Military, Politics, and Jammu and Kashmir. Mach61 21:44, 23 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Pinging users who participated in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sikh Soudhan Wars and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sudhanoti, also by this user: Fram, Svartner, TimothyBlue, HistoriesUnveiler, Xymmax, Rosguill. I believe this falls under WP:APPNOTE Mach61 04:54, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete per nom, and seconding the apparent CIR issues. The citations for this article read like the editor simply searched "Sudhan" in Google Scholar and added a citation to every result, regardless of content. Searching myself for terms like "Baral" 1956, "Baral Agreement", etc on Google Scholar and Google Books returned nothing useful. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 15:27, 24 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete per nomination. BottleOfChocolateMilk (talk) 17:51, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Publishers like Oxford University Press and Springer are not samizdat they are very respected publishers, article just needs a little bit of editing that's all.--TheQirim (talk) 18:58, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

  Can you demonstrate that any of the cited sources actually mention a "Baral Agreement" or otherwise address this topic? _signed, Rosguill ^talk 19:01, 25 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. This might be notable, but right now, it's a farrago of original research and random books. Even if cited in a few pages in two reliable sources, that's not significant coverage Bearian (talk) 19:48, 26 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete. I couldn't find any sources using this name. Those in the article are, as far as I can tell, about the 1955 Poonch uprising or the History of Azad Kashmir more broadly and only mention this agreement in passing, if at all. Eluchil404 (talk) 02:45, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: per the comment by Rosguill. Lagdo22 (talk) 06:09, 30 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.