The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ~ Amory (u • t • c) 15:59, 11 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Ballyblack Church (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Apparently its only notability is it's old. I don't think all old churches pass WP:GNG. Bbb23 (talk) 22:24, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete- it uses the church's website as a source, that doesn't pass WP:GNG. Nothing indicates that this is a historic site, a building's age doesn't give it auto-notability.--Rusf10 (talk) 22:35, 4 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Northern Ireland-related deletion discussions. Hhhhhkohhhhh (talk) 03:57, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. L3X1 ◊distænt write◊ 16:00, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• Did the nom do WP:BEFORE? See here for example. FloridaArmy (talk) 16:06, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• delete if you leave off the quotes you get lots of false hits, but I'm not finding any discussion of the church beyond its use as a meeting place. Mangoe (talk) 22:24, 5 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete lacks WP:INDEPENDENT sources and fails GNG Chetsford (talk) 05:33, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete only official website and Wiki-mirror sites has mentioned this church. Excelse (talk) 06:12, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 13:39, 6 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

• DElete -- A very typcial local church. It is not even all that old for a British church. Peterkingiron (talk) 17:01, 10 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.