[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
- Amy Anzel (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
This is a promotional article about a nonnotable TV presenter and actress written by an editor blocked for UPE. It's already been PROD'd or I would have tagged it for proposed deletion. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Liz Read! Talk! 02:56, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
- Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Television, Theatre, England, and New York. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 06:13, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
* Delete: Per Nom. Gratefulking (talk) 07:20, 24 February 2025 (UTC) WP:SOCKSTRIKE. Reading Beans, Duke of Rivia 05:49, 28 February 2025 (UTC)
- This account has been blocked for socking. Toadspike [Talk] 19:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. None of the non-primary sources have significant coverage. The only one close to counting towards the GNG is the Daily Record. A search for sources mainly turned up unreliable tabloids and summaries of TV episodes, with routine internet drama [1] being the best source I saw. Toadspike [Talk] 19:21, 25 February 2025 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 08:21, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- weak keep: Lots of coverage in UK media when she was on the Apprentice [2], [3], [4]. Not great coverage but it's enough in RS to build an article. Oaktree b (talk) 14:21, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- PinkNews [5] and a biography here [6] Oaktree b (talk) 14:23, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- I don't think those are enough to meet the GNG. The first source (link 2) is nothing but TV show plot summary and interview (not independent). The second is a summary of her tweets. The third is a Yahoo News piece summarizing an interview she gave in the Daily Star – which, in addition to not being independent, is a deprecated source. The PinkNews piece contains a smidgen of actual coverage in between more plot and tweet summaries; its biography section at the end seems to be entirely sourced from her website. The Jewish News source also seems to be based entirely on a interview with her; the only encyclopedic information is the second-to-last paragraph, which lists three projects she's worked on. Toadspike [Talk] 11:49, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- PinkNews [5] and a biography here [6] Oaktree b (talk) 14:23, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
- Redirect to
The Bachelor (American TV series) season 1– Keeping this page would mean including all of her resume. Hardly convinced that certain sources verify her general notability, especially tabloid-style ones. You can say that neither WP:BLP1E nor WP:BIO1E applies just because she also was eliminated from The Apprentice (UK) and produced a Happy Days musical, but I've yet to see a good chunk of reliable sources proving me wrong about her. @Toadspike: You don't mind this page becoming a redirect, do you? George Ho (talk) 15:00, 3 March 2025 (UTC); edited, 13:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC)- A redirect might be okay, but she's been in multiple notable shows, so choosing one target is hard. Based on the recent tabloid coverage perhaps The Apprentice (British TV series) series 16 is a better redirect target. Toadspike [Talk] 11:50, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'm okay with your suggested target
too.... or deletion. Initially, I mistook her as a Bachelor finalist. Re-reading the season article stood me corrected. George Ho (talk) 13:22, 4 March 2025 (UTC); edited, 13:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC) - On second thought, I like your suggested target a lot more than mine, but I'm also still okay with deletion as well. George Ho (talk) 13:38, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- I'm okay with your suggested target
- A redirect might be okay, but she's been in multiple notable shows, so choosing one target is hard. Based on the recent tabloid coverage perhaps The Apprentice (British TV series) series 16 is a better redirect target. Toadspike [Talk] 11:50, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Delete. GNG aside, the coverage is probably not enough to produce a decent article, under WP:SIGCOV. I considered redirecting, but like @Toadspike pointed out, it's hard to choose one to redirect to. (Acer's userpage |what did I do now) 11:55, 4 March 2025 (UTC)
- Keep. I've added articles with significant coverage, and revised wording to be impartial - page can be further improved but it passes WP:GNG. AwkoTaco19 (talk) 19:23, 8 March 2025 (UTC)