I noted that you removed this. I want to make sure that something is extremely, extremely clear here:

First, removing content from your talk page can be seen as you acknowledging what has been posted.

Second, if there is a conflict of interest, you must disclose this. If it discovered or determined that you have a COI and are deliberately trying to hide this COI to circumvent the COI guidelines, you can get blocked from editing Wikipedia. One can edit with a COI, but it has to be done extremely carefully and all content must follow Wikipedia's guidelines for editing. To that note, I do see that you have had varying degrees of notification about notability guidelines - however you have continued to create articles that have major issues with notability guidelines. Editors are expected to follow notability and editing guidelines, but COI editors are particularly expected to follow notability guidelines.

I can't emphasize enough that if you do have a COI - and it seems extremely likely that you do - it is an extremely bad idea to edit on that COI on Wikipedia without following guidelines to a T. Not responding to COI concerns is also not a good idea - even if there is a COI, transparency is required on Wikipedia. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:16, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I see that you did respond before removing it - still, it's extremely not a good idea to blank this out at this point in time. I think myself or Fram will bring this up at the conflict of interest noticeboard. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:17, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. Thank you. ReaderofthePack(formerly Tokyogirl79) (｡◕‿◕｡) 18:38, 27 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Samuel Felinton is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Samuel Felinton until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Ynsfial (talk) 15:45, 1 March 2025 (UTC)[reply]