A belated welcome!

The welcome may be belated, but the cookies are still warm!

Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, GN22! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:

Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! Adflatusstalk 22:16, 20 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, you are now famous

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L7LhngzE10I&t=11s Polygnotus (talk) 04:49, 3 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Trump vote

Re: [1]

Hello. The tally section includes: "Just vote in the survey section above. Others will take care of the update here."

For the sake of organization and the integrity of the voting, please post a bolded vote in the survey section. Thank you. ―Mandruss  IMO. 21:22, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

This is a worldwide project and it is inappropriate to limit any discussion by citizenship or nationality. I encourage you to withdraw this "poll". Cullen328 (talk) 03:57, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to post-1992 politics of the United States and closely related people, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

Valereee (talk) 18:22, 12 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2032 (February 16)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bluethricecreamman was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 20:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, GN22! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! User:Bluethricecreamman (Talk·Contribs) 20:22, 16 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
No tags for this post.